Closed bdolor closed 6 years ago
@lucwrite - ready for validation. There are a few known issues that I'll pick away at, like the blank pages left after the table of contents, but it would be helpful at this point to have someone else besides myself spot areas for improvement
Perfect ! I will take a look now.
Should the Global Options work now as part of this task?
Global Options are covered in https://github.com/BCcampus/pressbooks-mpdf/issues/33
Brad not sure how much detail you need for this validation. Here is a link to the doc that I have been using for testing for more details https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HVoXlhaaVJZEcD1Kczr1GD06v6ShVww37vmeuCPebOA/edit?usp=sharing Here are some high-level details:
Parity with Prince Title and ToC
Links
Image 1. Captions now appear small and under image b not center justified
Other Style
multiple blank page problem resolved via https://github.com/BCcampus/pressbooks-mpdf/commit/0f8a3227e23ff4a0a771a64f77d6626de547bcc3
toc styling is more in line with the chosen theme now
Validated: Multiple pages resolved. The toc styling still has styling issues, no longer all blue but includes multiple ...... and empty subject lines.
resolved via https://github.com/BCcampus/pressbooks-mpdf/pull/44 and subsequent commits
Description
The output of the PDF doesn't reflect the style choices defined by the theme.
Expected behaviour
There's a reasonable expectation that the output format would retain/reflect all or most of the styles determined by the chosen theme.
Actual behaviour
It resembles theme independence. There is very little (any?) relationship between a web theme and the look and feel of the PDF file