Closed ECGonzales closed 3 years ago
I think this is fixed? @ECGonzales is there still a problem? If so can you detail it here for posterity? Thanks!
@hover2pi No it is not fixed, as I'm not sure how to properly address it in SEDkit. I have been doing a work around, where I add/subtract the uncertainty of the photometry points and make those two SEDs therefore I have conservative errors. Using the upper and lower SEDs I use the difference for the uncertainty and propagate that for the new Teff uncertainty.
This is closely related to Issue #12 and I'll make sure uncertainties are propagated properly across all quantities when I implement a new error model in the next release.
I think this is finally fixed in #68 !
Fix the error propagation for fbol. Problem is likely the conversion of the error formula into code.