Support Akkoma and/or Pleroma

[bugsysop]

Plus une demande qu'un bug.

Est-ce vraiment intéressant de reporter ici des problèmes avec Pleroma alors que vous développez Mangane explicitement pour Akkoma ?

Je pensais, à la lecture de la doc d'Akkoma, que les deux projets était encore largement compatibles, mais j'ai soudain un doute.

Je pose aussi la question par rapport à l'idée d'ajouter le support de Mangane à l'application Pleroma de Yunohost... C'est peut-être finalement pas une bonne idée

[Cl0v1s]

Apparently, and with what I know of Akkoma / Pleroma, as long as most of the API are compatible, there is not particular issue with fixing issue for both Pleroma and Akkoma. Akkoma mostly adds features, exposing them through new API endpoints.

Moreover, Mangane already has a feature detection system allowing us to adapt the experience following what platform is used as a backend.

We are speaking about Akkoma here since we are planning to add akkoma specific features to the project without breaking any existing compatibility.

[bugsysop]

Thanks for responding... Will continue to flood you with bug reports ;-)

[Cl0v1s]

Thanks for that ! It's hard to see every issues since there is various configurations just as you noticed !