Closed karllark closed 9 months ago
Attention: 7 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
bcf2f08
) 42.30% compared to head (794901f
) 42.44%.:exclamation: Current head 794901f differs from pull request most recent head 3bb544f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3bb544f to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
beast/physicsmodel/creategrid.py | 69.23% | 4 Missing :warning: |
beast/physicsmodel/priormodel.py | 80.00% | 3 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Codacy analysis failure is for a complexity issue. This complexity is needed, so will ignore.
The visualizations of the Scylla and SMIDGE results have shown that the existing prior model in BEAST is not sufficient. Especially when considering the physicsmodel needed for the MegaBEAST (=BEAST prior model). Specifically, the distribution of dust and stars in distance was not modeled as anything other than flat. The stars are generally centered in the plane of a galaxy, often modeled as falling off with some exponential scale height. The is usually seen as concentrated into dust clouds that are located at a specific distance.
Two new prior models are now included "step" (for Av, Rv, fA) and "absexponential" (for dist) to make the priors more realistic.