Currenlty, the PlantUML to BUML converter understands the PlantUML syntax " A <|-- B " for generalizations.
Yet, another way of doing that would be in the class definition itself:
class A extends B {...}
This is currently not be supported by the converter but I feel might be relevant and seems not too difficult to add.
We are now reconsidering the "parsing" approach underlying new syntaxes around BUML so this will need to wait for that but I agree, it's a small but nice improvement
Currenlty, the PlantUML to BUML converter understands the PlantUML syntax " A <|-- B " for generalizations. Yet, another way of doing that would be in the class definition itself: class A extends B {...} This is currently not be supported by the converter but I feel might be relevant and seems not too difficult to add.