Open cthoyt opened 10 months ago
Any update on this BFO folks?
@cthoyt Is this the right repo to post this issue? Or is this a problem with the updated BFO2020?
@alanruttenberg @johnbeve
This is the repo that is linked from the OBO metadata entry on BFO: https://obofoundry.org/ontology/bfo
Hi Mark,
The original githu repo OBO is using is the BFO repo under BFO-ontology https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO/ I also posted an issue there asking for the license update.
If the BFO-2020 will be the official BFO that people should use, it seems that some links have to be changed.
Thanks, Asiyah
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 3:14 PM Chris Mungall @.***> wrote:
This is the repo that is linked from the OBO metadata entry on BFO: https://obofoundry.org/ontology/bfo
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO/issues/235#issuecomment-1915482503, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCPEPOMP56E3HYAYT5BZUTYQ77IPAVCNFSM6AAAAABB5KGXQSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJVGQ4DENJQGM . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Apologies all, I was unaware of this thread until @mark-jensen tagged me. I've been largely focused on BFO2020, but I see there are several issues with the version of BFO targeted by the dashboard that deserve attention. I will begin working through them.
Regarding this issue, I've added a title and description to the BFO 2.0 file targeted by the dashboard in this commit https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO/commit/857be9f15100531c7202ef0eb73142f95b70f3a7. I also ran a local ROBOT instance to confirm these two errors are resolved.
As @linikujp notes, the license issue https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO/issues/236 was addressed.
BFO fails on two super simple points:
1 ERROR missing_ontology_description http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo.owl dc:description
2 ERROR missing_ontology_title http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo.owl dc:title
I would directly add these, but I am not sure how to contribute