Add metal deck datasets

[IsakNaslundBh]

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #152

Add dataset for RichardLees decking Corrugated deck datasets Add dataset for SMD corrugated deck datasets

Test files

Data found here

Changelog

Additional comments

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check dataset-compliance @BHoMBot check copyright-compliance @BHoMBot check project-compliance

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `dataset-compliance` - check `copyright-compliance` - check `project-compliance`

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check dataset-compliance @BHoMBot check copyright-compliance @BHoMBot check project-compliance

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `dataset-compliance` - check `copyright-compliance` - check `project-compliance` There are 4 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[IsakNaslundBh]

RF51 appears to have a depth of 51mm in SMD.BRO.121.V4-SMD-TAB-Deckmanual but 52mm everywhere else I can find it:

How did you calculate the top width for the Ribdeck S60 and 80 products?

Good catches @peterjamesnugent . AS discussed offline, I have updated height to 51 for the R51 SMD deck.

For the RLD S60 and 80 products I have opted to simply remove them for now until an official good source of exact dimensions can be found.

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `dataset-compliance` - check `copyright-compliance` - check `project-compliance`

[peterjamesnugent]

@BHoMBot check compliance

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@peterjamesnugent to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `code-compliance` - check `documentation-compliance` - check `project-compliance` - check `branch-compliance` - check `dataset-compliance` - check `copyright-compliance`

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `ready-to-merge`

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

FAO: @FraserGreenroyd @IsakNaslundBh is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate. The check they wish to have dispensation on is ready-to-merge. If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with: > @BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. `23660791901`

[IsakNaslundBh]

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 23660791901

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@IsakNaslundBh I have now provided a passing check on reference `23660791901` as requested.