BHoM / BHoM_Engine

Internal manipulation of the BHoM
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
26 stars 13 forks source link

7.1 Deployment #3313

Closed bhombot-ci[bot] closed 5 months ago

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago

BHoM_Engine

Feature

gideontamir16 commented 5 months ago

Reviewed for Facades using March 18th beta artefact. Noting in Section 3.0 there is a reference to matching values in green panels but green panels do not appear in test script.

FraserGreenroyd commented 5 months ago

@BHoMBot check compliance

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `code-compliance` - check `documentation-compliance` - check `project-compliance` - check `branch-compliance` - check `dataset-compliance` - check `copyright-compliance` There are 27 requests in the queue ahead of you.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
Please be advised that the check with reference 22829283114 has more than 50 annotations of notes. API limitations restrict annotations to 50. You may need to rerun this check to obtain the next set when you make changes. At the time of reporting this check, there are 450 additional annotations waiting, made up of 16 errors and 434 warnings.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
Please be advised that the check with reference 22829296296 has more than 50 annotations of notes. API limitations restrict annotations to 50. You may need to rerun this check to obtain the next set when you make changes. At the time of reporting this check, there are 2593 additional annotations waiting, made up of 34 errors and 2559 warnings.
vgreen-BH commented 5 months ago

Reviewed for Facades using the March 19 beta artefact, all is behaving as expected per the test procedure.

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-installer` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on SQL_Toolkit
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-installer` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on SQL_Toolkit
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-versioning` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on BHoM
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-installer` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on SQL_Toolkit
FraserGreenroyd commented 5 months ago

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am requesting neutral checks on: null-handling, serialisation, dataset-compliance, unit-tests

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@FraserGreenroyd I have provided neutral checks to the checks requested. These checks will need to be run properly to obtain full results.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
FAO: @FraserGreenroyd @FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate. The check they wish to have dispensation on is beta-documentation-compliance. If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with: > @BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. `22829296296`
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
FAO: @FraserGreenroyd @FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate. The check they wish to have dispensation on is beta-code-compliance. If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with: > @BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. `22829283114`
FraserGreenroyd commented 5 months ago

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 22829296296

FraserGreenroyd commented 5 months ago

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 22829283114

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference `22829296296` as requested.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference `22829283114` as requested.
FraserGreenroyd commented 5 months ago

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am requesting neutral checks on: core

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@FraserGreenroyd I have provided neutral checks to the checks requested. These checks will need to be run properly to obtain full results.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 5 months ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-ready-to-merge` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on BHoM