BHoM / ETABS_Toolkit

Tools for ETABS and CSI Software
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
19 stars 9 forks source link

6.1 Deployment #423

Closed bhombot-ci[bot] closed 1 year ago

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago

ETABS_Toolkit

Feature

FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBot check beta-merge-status

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `beta-merge-status` There are 43 requests in the queue ahead of you.
FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBot check beta-merge-status

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `beta-merge-status` There are 43 requests in the queue ahead of you.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
MERGE REPORT - 2023-03-19 15:10. ERROR CODE(s): - DF001. DETAILS: - This pull request can NOT be merged without one or more of its upstream dependencies being merged. Merging this pull request without dependencies will cause compilation errors in this repository. See the check annotations for more information..
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
Please be advised that the check with reference 12111739689 has more than 50 annotations of notes. API limitations restrict annotations to 50. You may need to rerun this check to obtain the next set when you make changes. At the time of reporting this check, there are 22 additional annotations waiting, made up of 22 errors and 0 warnings.
hmoubarak commented 1 year ago

The toolkit functionality was tested against the sample scripts. Generally read/write functions are working fine. (Topics 1 to 4 in testing protocol). Panels don't update with geometry but that is expected. Results and their visualisation were spot checked but seemed ok. The code was not reviewed.

FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

While this pull request contains a sufficient review from @hmoubarak, unfortunately it is blocked by the inability to deploy one or more of the repositories higher up in this repositories dependency chain.

If there is sufficient demand, we may be able to look at doing a 6.1 beta patch and include it prior to the 6.2 beta.

I am closing this pull request to tidy up and complete the 6.1 deployment. The work will not be lost, and will be eligible for inclusion in the 6.2 beta if it is not deployed via a beta patch prior to the 6.2 beta.

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-installer` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on BHoM
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-versioning` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on BHoM
FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBot check compliance @BHoMBot check null-handling @BHoMBot check serialisation @BHoMBot check core

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `code-compliance` - check `documentation-compliance` - check `project-compliance` - check `branch-compliance` - check `dataset-compliance` - check `copyright-compliance` - check `null-handling` - check `serialisation` - check `core` There are 43 requests in the queue ahead of you.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-versioning` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on Revit_Toolkit
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@bhombot-ci[bot] just to let you know, I have provided a `check-installer` result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @FraserGreenroyd on Revit_Toolkit
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
FAO: @FraserGreenroyd @FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate. The check they wish to have dispensation on is beta-code-compliance. If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with: > @BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. `12305511626`
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
FAO: @FraserGreenroyd @FraserGreenroyd is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate. The check they wish to have dispensation on is beta-documentation-compliance. If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with: > @BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. `12305513570`
FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 12305513570

FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 12305511626

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference `12305513570` as requested.
bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@FraserGreenroyd I have now provided a passing check on reference `12305511626` as requested.
FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `ready-to-merge` There are 14 requests in the queue ahead of you.
FraserGreenroyd commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am requesting neutral checks on: ready-to-merge

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@FraserGreenroyd I have provided neutral checks to the checks requested. These checks will need to be run properly to obtain full results.
hmoubarak commented 1 year ago

@BHoMBothttps://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FBHoMBot&data=05%7C01%7CHabiba.Moubarak%40BuroHappold.com%7Cc24ca8b878ea42e9391008db2f7036d8%7C50ee6418869e48f5a9823607fcee1e1d%7C0%7C0%7C638155931219723361%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rKY0AKDBcDCFcIbuWZDbO5oqzVYt9eE9UxMAclAV3v0%3D&reserved=0 this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 12305511626

From: bhombot-ci[bot] @.> Sent: 28 March 2023 11:39 To: BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit @.> Cc: Habiba Moubarak @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit] 6.1 Deployment (PR #423)

External Email. This email originated from outside Buro Happold.

FAO: @FraserGreenroydhttps://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFraserGreenroyd&data=05%7C01%7CHabiba.Moubarak%40BuroHappold.com%7Cc24ca8b878ea42e9391008db2f7036d8%7C50ee6418869e48f5a9823607fcee1e1d%7C0%7C0%7C638155931219723361%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XwflPGi4pBb6suJ3Vd2oVLzA%2F0lbVueY0KqOE6IpcDk%3D&reserved=0 @FraserGreenroydhttps://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFraserGreenroyd&data=05%7C01%7CHabiba.Moubarak%40BuroHappold.com%7Cc24ca8b878ea42e9391008db2f7036d8%7C50ee6418869e48f5a9823607fcee1e1d%7C0%7C0%7C638155931219723361%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XwflPGi4pBb6suJ3Vd2oVLzA%2F0lbVueY0KqOE6IpcDk%3D&reserved=0 is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate.

The check they wish to have dispensation on is beta-code-compliance.

If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with:

@BHoMBothttps://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FBHoMBot&data=05%7C01%7CHabiba.Moubarak%40BuroHappold.com%7Cc24ca8b878ea42e9391008db2f7036d8%7C50ee6418869e48f5a9823607fcee1e1d%7C0%7C0%7C638155931219723361%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rKY0AKDBcDCFcIbuWZDbO5oqzVYt9eE9UxMAclAV3v0%3D&reserved=0 this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 12305511626

- Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FBHoM%2FETABS_Toolkit%2Fpull%2F423%23issuecomment-1486533053&data=05%7C01%7CHabiba.Moubarak%40BuroHappold.com%7Cc24ca8b878ea42e9391008db2f7036d8%7C50ee6418869e48f5a9823607fcee1e1d%7C0%7C0%7C638155931219723361%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qYdgwWZShzv1Qf%2FT%2FeNbD9rb4oMFZ9Q0OcPsw0444ZA%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FANCC5N7MGBNNM3QS73D35JTW6KWR7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAVZND2QE&data=05%7C01%7CHabiba.Moubarak%40BuroHappold.com%7Cc24ca8b878ea42e9391008db2f7036d8%7C50ee6418869e48f5a9823607fcee1e1d%7C0%7C0%7C638155931219723361%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=W1GjWJaY3c2bWDQi1g0m2uYfq61WnBnpf2QQ1o7u%2Fnk%3D&reserved=0. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

bhombot-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago
@hmoubarak sorry, I didn't understand. Was that comment an instruction for me? If so, could you state again what check you would like me to do? For a list of available instructions, please see [this wiki page](https://github.com/BHoM/documentation/wiki/Continuous-Integration).