Add Spandrel Force Result

[GCRA101]

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #430

Test files

Grasshopper File https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23457-AddSpandrelForceResult/Test%20Script.gh?csf=1&web=1&e=caphlX ETABS File https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23457-AddSpandrelForceResult/Test%20ETABS%20Model.EDB?csf=1&web=1&e=6N8BDm

Changelog

• Added SpandrelForce Class to the ETABS_oM Results namespace
• Added SpandrelForce value to Enum PierAndSpandrelResultType in the Requests namespace
• Added calls to ETABS API functions to extract Spandrel Forces from ETABS Model in the ETABS Adapter

[Chrisshort92]

I have tested the functionality and happy that it works as expected with the test scripts provided. @GCRA101 I will wait until the comments above have been addressed before approving this PR.

[GCRA101]

@IsakNaslundBh , @Chrisshort92 , thank you for reviewing and for your comments. I've updated the inheritance of the SpandrelForce Class to be from BarResult rather than from BarForce.

Updated code pushed to origin for your final check.

[GCRA101]

@peterjamesnugent thanks for your comments. I've updated the code in line with them. Retested using the linked etabs model file and the gh script. All works fine.

[Chrisshort92]

@BHoMBot check required

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@Chrisshort92 to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `code-compliance` - check `documentation-compliance` - check `project-compliance` - check `core` - check `null-handling` - check `serialisation` - check `versioning` - check `installer`

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `copyright-compliance`

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `ready-to-merge`

[GCRA101]

@peterjamesnugent , @Chrisshort92

I've updated the initialization call of the PierAndSpandrel enum as suggested by Isak in today's call. You can find the updated code for your review in the latest commit. c01050f91e6fb78b7f248fef8b6158614154ee70

[peterjamesnugent]

@BHoMBot check required

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@peterjamesnugent to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `code-compliance` - check `documentation-compliance` - check `project-compliance` - check `core` - check `null-handling` - check `serialisation` - check `versioning` - check `installer`

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `copyright-compliance`

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check null-handling

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `null-handling`

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci[bot]]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued: - check `ready-to-merge`