LCA Toolkit clean up discussion notes

[michaelhoehn]

Description:

Notes from a discussion with @mchaf @shivanierambaran @IsakNaslundBh @kayleighhoude regarding toolkit cleanup during our PR closure event. Notes below should be ticked off as addressed in the coming sprints/milestones and this issue should be closed when all points have been discussed.

Notes from the discussion

• [ ] Refactor of EPD class (full sprint, planning session required)
• [ ] Align project scope fields based on desired database host metadata requirements
• [ ] Raw material LCA composition is used as an input often in lieu of EPD. Similar to TM65 magic (@kayleighhoude @IsakNaslundBh)
• [ ] https://github.com/BHoM/LifeCycleAssessment_Toolkit/issues/204
• [ ] https://github.com/BHoM/LifeCycleAssessment_Toolkit/issues/162
• [ ] Strategy for reporting in general. How do we want to display and store results for data visualisations downstream (planning session required)
• [ ] Documentation refresh
• [ ] Sample scripts added to OS repo and all documentation used externally (@mchaf)
• [ ] Description refresh for all methods and updation with the API
• [ ] https://github.com/BHoM/LifeCycleAssessment_Toolkit/issues/252 (@kayleighhoude to check)
• [ ] https://github.com/BHoM/LifeCycleAssessment_Toolkit/issues/286 (@IsakNaslundBh to check)

Other outcomes from the discussion

• [x] Moved this issue https://github.com/BHoM/BHoM/issues/1464 (FYI @FraserGreenroyd )