Need to implement loads and combos; has there been a consensus on how to treat SAP structure vs. Robot/GSA/etc. structure? in SAP, Load Patterns are groups of loads, Load Cases are analyses to run (which usually correspond 1:1 with Load Patterns) and Load Combos are linear superposition of Load Case results.
I understand that in some other softwares loads are assigned directly to Cases without the intermediary of Patterns, though it is a very useful structure in CSI products.
This also relates to the issues with naming Load Cases in BuroHappoldEngineering/ETABS_Toolkit#59
Need to implement loads and combos; has there been a consensus on how to treat SAP structure vs. Robot/GSA/etc. structure? in SAP, Load Patterns are groups of loads, Load Cases are analyses to run (which usually correspond 1:1 with Load Patterns) and Load Combos are linear superposition of Load Case results.
I understand that in some other softwares loads are assigned directly to Cases without the intermediary of Patterns, though it is a very useful structure in CSI products.
This also relates to the issues with naming Load Cases in BuroHappoldEngineering/ETABS_Toolkit#59
@al-fisher @epignatelli @MartinHenriksen @enarhi