Closed FraserGreenroyd closed 4 years ago
I would personally say both of those items are outside the scope of the PR which focuses primarily on adding the capability for the API, but comments below:
- [ ] have discussed with @IsakNaslundBh actioning BHoM/BHoM_Engine#1461
If @IsakNaslundBh get's it done before 2 then yes.
- [ ] The "\n" in descriptions are missing in the API rendering. These help with readability so needed here too as in UI. Can we keep?
Not in this PR scope - the "\n" has had to be stripped to allow the JSON to currently be generated and I wouldn't have time to regenerate before 2. This is best raised as a new issue to be resolved because I would not want to jeopardise what we currently have at this short notice.
Issues addressed by this PR
Fixes #42
Test files
Changelog
Additional comments