Werner Krause and Dag Tanneberg case study

BIDS / repro-case-studies

Reproducibility case study contributions

31 stars 46 forks source link

Werner Krause and Dag Tanneberg case study #172

Closed garretchristensen closed 7 years ago

garretchristensen commented 7 years ago

[x] Is there a public link to the database, or the Shiny app that you've created?
[x] If there is no suggestion for the last question (Would you recommend any specific websites, training courses, or books for learning more about reproducibility?) then delete entirely.

dagtann commented 7 years ago

The database is not yet publicly accessible. We plan to publish it by the end of the year and could provide you with a public link later.
The last question has been deleted.

dagtann commented 7 years ago

Updated the wrong repo. I am fixing things right now.

garretchristensen commented 7 years ago

Great, thanks for the quick response. It's fine if there's no public link, but then could we state that somewhere in the text? Maybe soon after the database is first introduced, state that it will be posted when finished, or something to that effect? I just wouldn't want readers to be confused or search for it if not available.

dagtann commented 7 years ago

I'll take care of it.

⁣Sent from BlueMail

On Jun 14, 2017, 21:33, at 21:33, Garret Christensen notifications@github.com wrote:

Great, thanks for the quick response. It's fine if there's no public link, but then could we state that somewhere in the text? Maybe soon after the database is first introduced, state that it will be posted when finished, or something to that effect? I just wouldn't want readers to be confused or search for it if not available.

-- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/BIDS/repro-case-studies/issues/172#issuecomment-308534996

garretchristensen commented 7 years ago

@dagtann My apologies if I deleted the title to your workflow at some point, but I couldn't find one. I created a short YAML header in line with the formatting requirements for the book and used the title "Maintaining a Reproducible Database of Political Competition" If that's OK with you, then we're good to go. If you prefer something else, could you please issue a pull request with the updated title? Thanks!

garretchristensen commented 7 years ago

Also, I made a grayscale version of your diagram to be consistent with all the other diagrams. If you're unhappy with that, feel free to try and improve resolution yourself. I'm going to send all this stuff to Justin Kitzes now for inclusion--he may have some other minor comments.

dagtann commented 7 years ago

Thanks! The title should be Maintaining a Reproducible Database on political Parties, Elections, and Governments. Competition is only one aspect to what we do. Other than that we are fine with your edits.

garretchristensen commented 7 years ago

Updated title.