Closed messersc closed 5 years ago
Thanks for these comments too, @messersc. For 1., I've now stated in the manuscript that I use alpha 0.7, which I and others have found to be a good rule of thumb for mutation data. For other network sources (and fake network sources), I suggest you have a look at the netsmooth paper 1 where we discussed this.
As for batch normalizing mutations, unless you specify your concerns about what might be problematic, I'm not sure what I am missing :)
I can't find the parameter alpha that was used to run netsmooth to generate the smoothed mutation matrix. It would be nice to include it in the manuscript.
The choice of protein-protein network to use is essentially another hyperparameter. Would another PPI network perform similar? And even more interesting, how would a random network of similar density perform? Looking at the methods part and the code, I am be a bit concerned that batch normalizing the binary mutation input features (batch size n=50 per default) could be problematic. Am I missing something?