Wave 3 Results - JASIST Paper

[nniiicc]

Put link to draft and updates here

[lindseysschwartz]

• skeleton

[lindseysschwartz]

Abstract + outline

[lindseysschwartz]

"Policy legibility"

• outline
• background skeleton - precarity at 3 levels & Seattle backdrop
• LS memo

[lindseysschwartz]

Outline/draft #? -- this time is the charm: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x--HPQmnsNDkdtSSD1r-TIecOOpeNo-LunwySpDhhtE/edit#

[lindseysschwartz]

Paper draft 10.07 - no comments - fullest draft, minus conclusion and citations; shared with lab

Paper draft 07.20- with comments - includes comments on structure, alt. phrasing, citations

GigPlat Open Questions - NW memo on structure

[lindseysschwartz]

Revisiting transcripts: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1K9J7f1V-ZKrb9FTVQQhr0GI1yGHqVUq8W7cGEyihIcY/edit#gid=0

[lindseysschwartz]

@lindseysschwartz - motivate the interpretations, and place them back in the findings section --> conjecture, how often we saw it, and then substantiate

[lindseysschwartz]

@nniiicc -- reiterating the message I sent in slack - I built out the findings section of the gigplat paper -- see here -- but it definitely needs to be pared down. I plan to edit a hard copy to restructure the argument when I have fresh eyes. If you look it over before monday, what would be most helpful is highlighting points to elaborate on and points to exclude. I left comments around a few excerpts that may fit in. if they don’t, we’ve got them for later. thank you again!

[nniiicc]

👍

[lindseysschwartz]

Current draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yPMgkbUPmcE0X1vKeEA560QxLcdTDUtRBXeidx0WaWc/edit#

To dos

• [x] Write a reverse outline from the draft (including an unwritten discussion / conclusion section)
• [ ] Clarify "contributions" vs "implications" vs "findings"
  • Set up the contribution and implications in the Introduction in short sentences
  • The expand upon these contributions, tying back to the findings, in the Conclusion section

Other notes:

• [ ] Make consistent the dates (2019-2022); as well as things like “three years”
• [x] Explain Design vs Implementation of policy
  • Policy is hard to design because of compensation structure
  • Difference bw roles of City Council and OLS
  • We describe implementation in the findings section, but need to summarize design beforehand
• [x] Legislation vs regulation vs policy vs municipal ordiance
• [x] Table for the policies in Seattle
• [x] In the background - under explaining regulation - talking about why this is so hard to design - what are you rewarding, per task, per mile, or per minute...
• [x] include Uber / Lyft fined by Seattle
• [ ] Sentiment section needs transition from Policy Access
• [x] Sentiment section streamlined...
• [ ] Reverse engineer the finding section from the “implications of findings” (from 07/20 draft)