Seems to switch focus back and forth between papers and display items. Be clearer about unit of analysis at each stage
[x] Clarify that assessment is about computational reproducibility of display items; not claims or robustness checks
[x] Maybe replace letters with numbers or levels?
[x] Clarify that reproducibility scores are only used in Assessment and Improvements stages. We don't ask reproducers to assign scores to robustness checks.
[x] Fix numbering inconsistencies between stages and chapter numbers
[ ] Add more tips with recommendations on best course of action for reproducer
Seems to switch focus back and forth between papers and display items. Be clearer about unit of analysis at each stage