We need to decide which fields we want to include, and what we will call them in our database schema. Naming should be a compromise between the labels used in our ontology (not sure what would be applicable here, as FlowObject is not a subclass) and the names used by the US EPA. Fewer changes means more interoperability.
cmutel
commented
4 years ago
The US EPA flow list has a number of useful fields.
We need to decide which fields we want to include, and what we will call them in our database schema. Naming should be a compromise between the labels used in our ontology (not sure what would be applicable here, as
FlowObjectis not a subclass) and the names used by the US EPA. Fewer changes means more interoperability.