Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Original comment by dwhall...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2010 at 1:34
Original comment by dwhall...@gmail.com
on 12 Aug 2010 at 2:28
Integrate Thomas Ng's File IO for the desktop (submitted via maillist
2010/10/04). I put it in a file and attached it to this issue
Original comment by dwhall...@gmail.com
on 16 Oct 2010 at 7:28
Attachments:
From Tyler Wilson via maillist on 2010/10/04:
When I saw this come through, I thought the same thing: it would be nice to
have this in the Windows build, at the minimum for testing. So I just gave a
quick shot incorporating Thomas' code in the Windows platform. Here are some
notes:
- I put Thomas' code in a file.py in the Windows platform folder, and added
that .py file to the pmImgCreator step when building the main_img.c and
main_nat.c files.
- I added fcntl.h, io.h, sys/types.h and sys/stat.h and string.h includes to
the Windows plat.h to allow the source to build.
- There is no bzero function in MS SDK. I changed it to the good old memset
function. Note this is also suggested here:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/bzero.html
- wrt to the 0666 flag on the open call, I re-read the docs here
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/open.html and note that
open takes a variable number of parameters, with a minimum of two. So on
Windows I changed that line to be simply:
fd = open(ppath, fsf);
which appears to build just fine (untested though).
- wrt to the static buffer used in the module, I personally think it ought to
be allocated from the main heap set aside in the main p14p module (part of the
PM_HEAP_SIZE defined in plat.h). This way we know exactly where the memory is
coming from, and it is easier to track how much memory is being used in the
whole system; that is, it won't be 'hidden' anywhere.
- For the open, read, write and close calls, I get a number of annoying
warnings about these functions being deprecated, suggesting the use of the ISO
C++ versions, which are the same with a prepended '_'. So they become _open,
_read, _write and _close. Can we use these instead? My understanding is that
they should work on Linux/GCC as well (I will test with cygwin too).
Annoying Windows aside: I also define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS since I get
warnings about the basic _open function being insecure. Likely not a huge issue
since we are not building highly secure apps, but just worth noting.
That should do it,
Tyler
Original comment by dwhall...@gmail.com
on 16 Oct 2010 at 7:30
Original comment by dwhall...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2010 at 3:32
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dwhall...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2009 at 6:19