Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
First of all, you MUST clarify which transfer speed you means exactly.
In case of it is transfer from/to USB HDD(flash) to/from client, it is expected
behavior since ntfs-3g used for write access to NTFS volumes and router CPU
slow.
You can monitor it by "top" command in telnet/ssh session.
Second, nobody can guarantee 300 Mbit/s for any wireless connection. It is
maximum speed in ideal environment.
P.S. Sorry, none of us understand German language.
Original comment by lly.dev
on 11 Feb 2012 at 1:03
I report this for MrMmmkay, because he fears google :)
I guess he means the transmission rate that is shown at the "state of wireless
connection" via windows. ntfs-3g should not be affected, as he's doing a backup
to an network-hdd, not to an USB-attached one.
"300 Mbit/s for any wireless connection." yes - that was exaggerated.
P.S. I use translate.google.com to translate the russian threads to English -
you can do the same with threads in the german sub-forum ;)
Original comment by exclamat...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2012 at 11:45
Unfortunately, Google translate didn't get answer. I tried it before my first
comment. For example, translated text:
"If NTFS support is enabled are nurnoch wireless transmission rates of around
150kb / s (even next to the router), the connection speed also varies Windows
displays very strong, right down to 11mb / s
Nach dem Deaktivieren vom NTFS Support sind neben dem Router wieder 10mb/s
möglich, die angezeigte Verbindungsgeschwindigkeit im Windows sinkt nicht mehr
unter 200mb/s. After disabling the NTFS support in addition to the router again
10mb / s, the displayed connection speed in Windows no longer falls under 200mb
/ s"
I can't understand what kind of speed measured in above sentence, except
"Windows shows something".
1) Your guess may be wrong
2) There were might be other local processes on router, such as torrents
3) I can't reproduce similar behavior
Original comment by lly.dev
on 13 Feb 2012 at 7:02
http://wl500g.info/showpost.php?p=245071&postcount=12
On my 500gP it's no problem either...
Original comment by exclamat...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2012 at 10:46
Thanks, its much clear. But I still can't imagine correlation with Wi-Fi
Connection Speed & ntfs-3g...
Can MrMmmkay check router CPU load at web-UI "Status & Log" -> "System
Utilization" ?
Will same behavior observed on previous firmware release r3497 ?
Original comment by lly.dev
on 13 Feb 2012 at 11:12
ok - it turns out, that the channel settings cause the wireless slowdown...
http://wl500g.info/showpost.php?p=245110&postcount=14
Original comment by exclamat...@gmail.com
on 14 Feb 2012 at 10:53
Also, it might be effect of updated Broadcom SDK 5.60 in r3702. Due this
assumption I asked to check r3497
Take a look at Issue 298
Original comment by lly.dev
on 14 Feb 2012 at 11:07
http://wl500g.info/showpost.php?p=245157&postcount=17
Original comment by lly.dev
on 16 Feb 2012 at 11:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
exclamat...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2012 at 12:34