Closed orhtej2 closed 5 months ago
Yes, you're right. It requires a small change so I'll work on it as soon as possible
Hey @orhtej2, I included this change in #73. Can you confirm if it works for you?
This change was included by https://github.com/BaldissaraMatheus/Tasks.md/pull/73 so I'll close this issue. If someone thinks it's not working properly or could be improved, feel free to comment here and I'll open the issue again.
Hi, thanks for that, I did not have the time to test bare metal deployments yet but the change looks OK!
TY for implementing this :)
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 3:13 PM Matheus Baldissara @.***> wrote:
This change was included by #73 https://github.com/BaldissaraMatheus/Tasks.md/pull/73 so I'll close this issue. If someone thinks it's not working properly or could be improved, feel free to comment here and I'll open the issue again.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BaldissaraMatheus/Tasks.md/issues/69#issuecomment-1938757647, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAV5D5RD2GDT5I7JHGCDE5DYTIPR5AVCNFSM6AAAAABCYH4G5SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMZYG42TONRUG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
While I understand target audience is supposed to run via Docker there's no technical reason why the directory where data is stored and port the app is listening on are not sourced from
process.env
.This would allow bare metal hosting at no cost to app's maintainability.