Annotated pdf with suggestions for improvements.

[Hjdskes]

Here is an annotated pdf with suggestions for improvements. Note that this pdf is not the latest version available (we move too fast for that :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:), so some sections that I know have been worked on are not annotated. These sections will need to be reviewed separately (please mention those below so we won't forget them).

Section 3 and 4 currently discuss mostly the same things; these need to be merged. Therefore neither section is annotated (also because section 4 is my own, which somebody else should check).

When you fix or comment on an annotation, please be as explicit as possible as to which annotation we are talking about so I can keep the pdf updated appropriately.

main_annotated.pdf

[Hjdskes]

An annotation (definition 1.3, page 2) fixed thanks to Gerlof: main_annotated.pdf

[StefanBoodt]

I have noticed that chapter 6 (Applications) only contains a general introduction into the chapter. Should this not be annotated as well. I also noticed that we still lack an abstract and a conclusion. The number of words also seems to overflow the 7000, although that is every word in the PDF except for the references, but that still means we should be careful.

[Hjdskes]

Chapter six is currently on hold until we are done with the other chapters: it is more important to get all theory in the article than it is to highlight popular applications. That and the fact that it is written by myself are the reasons it is not annotated.

As for the abstract and conclusion, @pvanagtmaal is working on those currently (check the Telegram discussion).

Chapters three and four currently overlap a lot, which I will take care of either tonight or tomorrow. This should help bring the word count down. AFAIK, texcount gives a lower total. How are you calculating the amount of words?

[StefanBoodt]

@Unia The missing sections was simply an observation, as it was really strange to include that small introduction but not anything else. As for the number of words, that is by copying every word in the resulting PDF and than letting them get counted, as stated in the original message.

I shall also shorten the part about the W-method a little, as I think it currently contains a little duplicate information.

[Hjdskes]

Updated annotations to incorporate @Balletie's changes made in #23.

main_annotated.pdf

[Hjdskes]

Updated to reflect changes made by @alangerak in #31.

main_annotated.pdf

[Hjdskes]

Updated with @Balletie's #23

main_annotated.pdf

[Hjdskes]

^ Again.

main_annotated.pdf