Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
+Chris as our resident GWT expert
Original comment by kurt.kluever
on 11 Mar 2013 at 5:02
Hmm. If anything, I would have hoped that v14 would have *helped* with any
GwtPlatform problems (not that I was aware of any problems in practice):
http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/detail?r=02e459aacc3b534a580cd65
6b2e5d167b8b45026&name=v14.0
GWT should be using GwtPlatform only in development mode. Is that where you're
seeing the error?
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 5:25
Actually yes, I see that error on gwt dev mode and only sets that has 1
element. If I put another element, it creates a regular set and everything is
fine
Original comment by gokhano...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 6:27
Thanks. I can reproduce it as you've described.
I notice this TODO in GwtPlatform:
"Once we start using server-side source in hosted mode, we won't need this."
It sounds like hosted mode (i.e., dev mode) didn't use to do that before but
that now it does. It may be enough for us to just get rid of the class. I'll
investigate further. This will probably deserve a patch release.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 9:04
Err, what I said doesn't make sense: Dev mode is *still* using client-side
source, as we can tell from its use of GwtPlatform. In case that's not
convincing, here's the stack trace:
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/google/common/collect/GwtPlatform
at com.google.common.collect.Platform.newArray(Platform.java:41)
at com.google.common.collect.ObjectArrays.newArray(ObjectArrays.java:45)
at com.google.common.collect.ImmutableCollection.toArray(ImmutableCollection.java:52)
That's all emul code.
So maybe the fix is to compile the dev-mode GwtPlatform as part of the
server-side GWT sources? I'll try that.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 9:42
Initial results are positive: My dummy app no longer gets a
NoClassDefFoundError, and the other tests I've run still pass. I'll do some
more testing tomorrow.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 11:18
Testing is still looking good. I'm now trying to figure out how important
GwtPlatform's @GwtScriptOnly annotation is in the hope that we can eliminate it
-- or GwtPlatform entirely, to minimize the chance of problems like this in the
future, especially since our tests don't detect them.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 12 Mar 2013 at 9:16
We can safely remove @GwtScriptOnly from the
guava-gwt/src/com/google/common/collect copy of GwtPlatform: It's the
annotation on the copy in
guava-gwt/src-super/com/google/common/collect/super/com/google/common/collect
that appears to be authoritative. This saves us from having to ask some
questions about new dependencies internally.
My attempts to eliminate GwtPlatform entirely have been unsuccessful for
reasons that I don't quite understand. I'll be working with the GWT team to get
that figured out.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 12 Mar 2013 at 10:15
I was wrong about most of this. It's true that GWtPlatform needs to be
available on the server side, but this was already true. Or rather, it should
have been true if not for the real problem, a sourceDirectory error I
introduced a while back and fixed for rc3:
http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/detail?r=f3a94bc591b3c738bb4b04f
95e263515f0b62f29&name=v14.0-rc3
But somehow the fix isn't in 14.0-final. It looks like that may have gotten
branched from 14.0-rc2 instead of rc3. If so, the good news is that we don't
need to wait at all before releasing 14.0.1, since we've already had its rc out
for testing... :) Kurt?
http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/list?name=v14.0
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 13 Mar 2013 at 4:05
This was fixed in 14.0.1.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 10 Apr 2013 at 9:20
This issue has been migrated to GitHub.
It can be found at https://github.com/google/guava/issues/<issue id>
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 1 Nov 2014 at 4:12
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 3 Nov 2014 at 9:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
gokhano...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 3:23