Open Bandov opened 2 months ago
In the UG, we specified clearly that the field is sorted in lexicographical order, not numerical ordering. Thus, this is a correct behaviour as intended.
/var/folders/tg/yrcwyrrj2_qc1tf0swypgctw0000gn/T/ru.keepcoder.Telegram/telegram-cloud-photo-size-5-6138804929951809370-x.jpg
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Feature Flaw (Severity LOW) Steps to reproduce
Expected for name 2 to be sorted ahead of name 12345678 Actual contact 2 is under contact 12345678![Screenshot 2024-04-19 at 4.36.32 PM.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Bandov/pe/main/files/0801e012-45fe-42a9-a134-91e1eb1e64fe.png)