Closed kasperkamperman closed 9 years ago
What version of Processing and ControlP5 are you using? The existing code works fine for me with Processing 2.2.1 and ControlP5 2.0.4.
Sorry. Processing 2.2.1 and ControlP5 2.2.3 (however 2.2.5 was also broken, that's why I tried 2.2.3).
It seems a lot of functions have changed. I filled already an issue on ControlP5, because in the docs the old functions are still visible. In their examples not.
For the time being, we're holding this as being compatible with ControlP5 2.0.4. As and when ControlP5 becomes compatible with Processing 3.0 we may make Datastream compatible with future versions. At this stage, can you work around by using ControlP5 2.0.4?
No problem. But I have used the newest version of ControlP5 without problems in Processing 3.0. Although I know they say it's not officially compatible.
Maybe you can add the version number in the introduction?
requires controlp5 (version 2.0.4) to be in your processing libraries folder:
I shall add the version requirements to the comments block - and see if I can dedicate some time to getting it working with 3.0 if that looks promising already! Do you mind if I ask what you are using Datastream to do? We're always interested to see how our customers use our code and interested to hear if there are any feature requests users have.
Well was trying proximity with a MPR121 board and tried different libraries. The plotting function looked handy to visualise some data (because of the multiple colours). Although I'm not really in need of the user interface.
I case it might become handy I did some plotting code too. Feel free to use it: https://gist.github.com/kasperkamperman/52a1c253f5689f37991f
Thanks - looks very interesting. Do you mind my asking what the end project is?
On 20 October 2015 at 15:34, kasperkamperman notifications@github.com wrote:
Well was trying proximity with a MPR121 board and tried different libraries. The plotting function looked handy to visualise some data (because of the multiple colours). Although I'm not really in need of the user interface.
I case it might become handy I did some plotting code too. Feel free to use it: https://gist.github.com/kasperkamperman/52a1c253f5689f37991f
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/BareConductive/mpr121-grapher/issues/1#issuecomment-149569845 .
I working on a touch control for a light. But it's also some general research. I've a lot of students that are interested working with capacitive touch. So I can help them a bit when they get stuck.
Ah, sounds cool. We've just released the Touch Board Workshop Guide (http://www.bareconductive.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/TouchBoard_Workshop_Manual.pdf) which might be a useful resource for you and your students. We're also just about to release a workshop pack of multiple Touch Boards at a discounted rate which might be useful if you decide to use the Touch Board in the future - details will be on the website when it launches.
On 20 October 2015 at 15:47, kasperkamperman notifications@github.com wrote:
I working on a touch control for a light. But it's also some general research. I've a lot of students that are interested working with capacitive touch. So I can help them a bit when they get stuck.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/BareConductive/mpr121-grapher/issues/1#issuecomment-149573103 .
A lot of functions used don't seem to be supported. Dropdown is not a group anymore but a controller.
I've modified a part of the code, see below. I've commented the old code. Still the script doesn't work completely (the graph positions don't seem to change well).
mpr121_grapher.pde
GUIhelpers.pde