search

BasedHardware / Friend

AI wearable necklace
https://basedhardware.com
MIT License
2.04k stars 219 forks source link

Top 5 billboard charts plug-in #359

Closed bbookman closed 5 days ago

josancamon19 commented 5 days ago

Could you explain more about this? And also, please follow the prompt structure as you can see on other plugins, thanks!

bbookman commented 5 days ago

Journaling as described in the description

Software organizations typically decide to close pull requests based on several factors:

  1. Completion of review process: Once the code has been thoroughly reviewed, all comments addressed, and necessary changes implemented, the pull request can be closed by merging it[1].

  2. Inactivity or lack of response: If a pull request remains idle for an extended period (e.g., a couple of weeks) without any response from the contributor, it may be closed[3].

  3. Failed tests or continuous integration: If the changes break existing tests or fail to pass continuous integration, and the contributor is unable or unwilling to fix the issues, the pull request may be closed[3].

  4. Out of scope or undesired changes: If the proposed changes are deemed out of scope for the project or undesirable, maintainers may close the pull request after explaining the reasons[3].

  5. Project status changes: If a project is no longer actively maintained or has changed direction, maintainers may close open pull requests and communicate this decision in the project's README[3].

  6. Quality concerns: If the proposed changes do not meet the project's quality standards and the contributor is unable to improve them, the pull request may be closed[3].

  7. Discussions going off-track: If discussions on a pull request deviate significantly from the original intent or become unproductive, maintainers may close it to maintain focus[3].

To ensure a positive community experience, it's important for maintainers to communicate clearly about the reasons for closing pull requests and to provide guidance on how contributors can improve future submissions[3].

Sources [1] When would polling for events be better than using observer pattern? https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/102771/when-would-polling-for-events-be-better-than-using-observer-pattern [2] About pull requests - GitHub Docs https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/about-pull-requests [3] Kindly Closing Pull Requests - The GitHub Blog https://github.blog/2016-03-15-kindly-closing-pull-requests/ [4] How to Avoid the Pull Request Paradox? - BairesDev https://www.bairesdev.com/blog/how-to-avoid-the-pull-request-paradox/ [5] Ability to to end a poll - Constant Contact Community - 346025 https://community.constantcontact.com/t5/Ideas/Ability-to-to-end-a-poll/idi-p/346025