Closed bittner closed 3 weeks ago
Note that, as a topic, this is related to PR #2220, but the changes don't overlap.
The lint job fails for reasons that are unrelated to the changes in this PR.
Would someone mind merging this PR?
This PR looks like it would be ready for merging! :pretzel:
Hey there, this is a great enhancement! It makes the Git experience even more consistent than it is today. :smiley:
Easy choice. Go ahead, review and merge it! Now. :100: :dart: :bow_and_arrow: :bowing_woman:
Adds Git aliases for merging are rebasing, which are needed when conflicts occur.
Description
For a better user experience, the same pattern for constructing the aliases is applied for merge and rebase. The aliases also largely match the ones provided by OMZ.
gms
is inspired by OMZ (I have never used it, personally).Motivation and Context
When working with branches conflicts can occur and need to be resolved. This may involve options like
--continue
and--abort
for merge and rebase. Some developers may even want to perform--interactive
rebasing.How Has This Been Tested?
I have the identical changes integrated in a fresh, local installation of Bash-it on my developer laptop.
To verify that the aliases don't conflict with existing ones, I have grepped the current repository HEAD for "gma", "gmc", "gms", "grba", "grbc" and "grbi".
Types of changes
Checklist:
clean_files.txt
and formatted it usinglint_clean_files.sh
.