evoling
commented
7 years ago amŋirootken ‘eight’ has the relational suffix -kin(e-). It's quite a complex form, literally something like "only the third", meaning "one hand and just three fingers of the next". It's in my grammar on p301 if you want to know the details.
The stem of anŋelon ‘wave’ must be anŋelo- because of forms like anŋelolʔən ‘wavy, rough (of the sea)’ and anŋelok ‘to be rough (of the sea)’
Plenty of nouns ending with 'н' in the Uniparser dictionary have the N-nom-n paradigm (which should mean III class), but their lexeme is the same as the absolutive stem (which is in italics):
{'lex': 'амңырооткэн', 'paradigms': ['N-obl', 'N-nom-n', 'N-pl'], 'stem': ['амңырооткэн', 'амңырооткэн', 'амңырооткэн', 'амңырооткэн'], 'trans_ru': 'восемь'} {'lex': 'анңэлён', 'paradigms': ['N-obl', 'N-nom-n', 'N-pl'], 'stem': ['анңэлён', 'анңэлён', 'анңэлён', 'анңэлён'], 'trans_ru': 'волна (морская)'}
Is it that the paradigm is wrong or that the stems should be shorter?
Also, N-nom-n paradigm iin the Uniparser dictionary should mean "take stem[2] and add 'н'", but it is written so that it includes words ending with 'н' that take no absolutive suffix.
Supposedly that all should mean that it's class I, but all these words are also marked with non-existent paradigm 'N-pl', and it is highly suspicious.