Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Second the defect.
Using XP Media Center Edition 2002 with latest patches and SP3.
Original comment by roza.cho...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2009 at 7:02
Yeah, I am aware about that. This is due to windows service support: Mongoose
calls
some Service Control Manager functions that are slow. Without that, startup is
instant.
I will take a look.
Original comment by valenok
on 22 May 2009 at 7:06
Original comment by valenok
on 22 May 2009 at 9:18
Okay, but note that I am not using the Windows Service version of Mongoose but
rather
just the standalone file mongoose-2.6.exe. It should not be making any calls to
the
Service Manager.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 22 May 2009 at 11:11
I have removed all service related code from Mongoose, and will use separate
executable, srvany (part of Microsoft Resource Kit) as service launcher.
Submitted change http://code.google.com/p/mongoose/source/detail?r=378
Now, Mongoose starts instantly.
You would need to either wait for release 2.7 or sync to trunk and build
yourself.
Original comment by valenok
on 22 May 2009 at 8:57
From what I remember, srvany.exe was a not a redistributable file.
Original comment by gilbert....@gmail.com
on 23 May 2009 at 4:37
I was unable to recreate this issue on XP Home or Vista Home Premium. The
first time
I ran there was a very short delay (<1 sec), and subsequent times there was no
delay.
Original comment by gilbert....@gmail.com
on 23 May 2009 at 5:05
The root of the problem was StartServiceCtrlDispatcher() function. Mongoose
called it
at startup. If mongoose.exe was run by Windows Service Control Manager (SCM),
that
function did block until service was stopped. If mongoose.exe was run by user,
that
function return.
For some reason, StartServiceCtrlDispatcher() sometimes takes long time to
return if
mongoose.exe was started by user, and sometimes it is almost instant. I am
unable to
tell why.
Original comment by valenok
on 23 May 2009 at 7:10
About srvany.exe, how can I confirm that? I am not a lawyer.
If this is really the case, I will need to write my own version of it.
Original comment by valenok
on 23 May 2009 at 7:13
Normally a program that can run as both a service and a console application
will have
a command line parameter to indicate which mode to run. It would not be too
hard to
have a command line parameter of "-service" that would indicate to interface
with the
Service Control Manager. The installer could also be modified to include the
necessary command line.
Original comment by gilbert....@gmail.com
on 23 May 2009 at 7:45
I do not know how to tell SCM to supply -service argument when it starts
mongoose.
Original comment by valenok
on 23 May 2009 at 7:50
The program can have another command line option to install itself as a service
by
calling CreateService. The command line to the service can be specified as
part of
the path. Be sure to put double quotes around the executable path (especially
if it
will contain spaces.) The sc command may also specify parameters in the
binpath by
using double quotes, but it may not be able to put quotes around the executable
name
possible causing the wrong exe to be launched. Without quotes around the
executable
path the OS might think that you wish to run 'C:\Program.exe' with the command
line
of 'Files\Mongoose\Mongoose.exe -service'.
Original comment by gilbert....@gmail.com
on 23 May 2009 at 8:36
If all Windows users have the SC command installed, it can detect whether
Mongoose
has been installed and is running as a service. Then you would not need a
command
option to inform Mongoose whether it is server-based or standalone.
By the way, thanks for being so responsive to user comments. You are a great
developer and your product is wonderful.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 23 May 2009 at 1:15
Cool, thanks for the ideas, I will experiment to find what fits best.
Currently, I like external launcher idea more, since it keeps the server free of
service specific code and dependencies.
Original comment by valenok
on 23 May 2009 at 5:30
I agree.
Original comment by googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 23 May 2009 at 5:40
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
googl...@springtimesoftware.com
on 21 May 2009 at 1:52