We may want to still include some original histogram plots (time to first food)
For the no communication case, are these hungry birds? Or random birds? Hungry may be a better comparison, but from the inference results it looks random birds.
For the communication case, why is the follower score high? Could/should this be regularized away?
The median lines for the communication coefficient plots don't quite look right (don't look like it's the median. Unless some of the data is cut off?)
For current fig 3, may want to match the axis limits
We may want to combine figures 3&4
For the r/h/f figure, I don't understand why the followers are less separated than they were on the poster
Responses to these points, after discussion with Rafal:
Don't include original histogram plots, bc this was a different simulation. If anything, do histograms of the 45x45 grid data that is shown in the figure, but seems unnecessary.
They were hungry birds. The histograms are stacked histograms! Make this clear in the legend. Consider plotting differently in final version, since this was not immediately intuitive.
For a final version, look at the joint distribution of c (communication coeff) and p (follower coeff). What explanations are valid? i.e. does the joint distribution give weight to low-p regimes (the case that generated the data).
They are stacked histograms! Make clear in the legend, and consider plotting differently in future.
For the communicator birds figures:
For the r/h/f figure, I don't understand why the followers are less separated than they were on the poster
COL-277