Open michael-o opened 2 years ago
I noticed the same behavior for thin jails as already mentioned by @michael-o.
I think a combination of bootstrap
and some kind of migrate/upgrade
command, that changes/remounts affected jails would mitigate this limitation.
I can think of something like:
bastille bootstrap 12.3-RELEASE
bastille upgrade myjail 12.3-RELEASE
This would also allow for different basejail releases.
bastille upgrade is being depreciated and removed per @cedwards
bastille upgrade is being depreciated and removed per @cedwards
Where is this written? Neither docs nor https://github.com/BastilleBSD/bastille/releases/tag/0.10.20231013 mention it.
we haven't done it yet, was put on the roadmap by @cedwards last night.
[MANDATORY] Describe the bug [MANDATORY] When you update your bootstrap release from 12.2-RELEASE to 12.3-RELEASE the mountpoint still retains old name.
[MANDATORY] Bastille and FreeBSD version (paste
bastille -v && freebsd-version -kru
output)[MANDATORY] How did you install bastille? (port/pkg/git) port
[optional] Steps to reproduce?
The mountpoint remains as 12.2-RELEASE.
[optional] Expected behavior I would expect a move to 12.3-RELEASE on FS level too. I know that thin jails are affected as well. Alternatively, one would bootstrap 12.3-RELEASE and then an upgrade on thin jails would remount the base system and update all files in
/etc
.For now, this is somewhat problematic.