I think there are some "gaps" in the bibtex-csl mapping. The post in which we did the original mapping is here
http://www.docear.org/2012/08/08/docear4word-mapping-bibtex-fields-and-types-with-the-citation-style-language
However, it seems that not everything is implemented in Docear4Word. If you have a look at the attached "bibtex -- csl field mapping.docx/bib" you will see the problems. Although provided in the BibTeX file the following fields are not shown in the Word document for most of the entries
number (should be mapped to "number" or "issue" in CSL)
DOI
URL
editor
series
publisher or organization
Joeran
commented
10 years ago
I think there are some "gaps" in the bibtex-csl mapping. The post in which we did the original mapping is here http://www.docear.org/2012/08/08/docear4word-mapping-bibtex-fields-and-types-with-the-citation-style-language However, it seems that not everything is implemented in Docear4Word. If you have a look at the attached "bibtex -- csl field mapping.docx/bib" you will see the problems. Although provided in the BibTeX file the following fields are not shown in the Word document for most of the entries
number (should be mapped to "number" or "issue" in CSL) DOI URL editor series publisher or organization
see email from September 24, 2013