Open Beep6581 opened 6 years ago
My thoughts are really scattered on this. In my view this tool has way too many modes. I dare to admit that only after @agriggio implemented his masked regions tool, I discovered that the Color toning module was useful for me at all. Since the default mode and setting were a wacky two-tone blue-orange, I had previously always thought this was this module was just an 'artistic' filter, and I had always shunned it. But now I know some of the modes are actually useful, and the Lab regions is spectacularly powerful! So at least it's a very good thing that's now the default (right? although it's not the first item in the dropdown).
As for the naming of the other modes, maybe I don't care enough, because I personally see very little value in keeping them around 😉 That being said, I think I can live with your final suggestion.
Our current color toning method names (0):
I want to rename them in a consistent and meaningful scheme.
If we go by the documentation, the old methods are split into "blending" and "addition". Assuming this distinction benefits the user, the proposed style would be (1):
Assuming the user doesn't benefit from that distinction, we could name them by what they expose (2):
which is a bit long, so shortened (3)
which sorted would be (3-sorted):
Thoughts?