Canon EOS RP color target shots - Githubissues

Beep6581 / RawTherapee

A powerful cross-platform raw photo processing program

https://rawtherapee.com

GNU General Public License v3.0

2.7k stars 308 forks source link

Canon EOS RP color target shots #5572

Closed MeaningfulName-69 closed 4 years ago

MeaningfulName-69 commented 4 years ago

It was sunny a couple of days ago so I went out and shot some photos of my color checker with the EOS RP, and did the tungsten ones indoors that night. I only learned that evening that the cameras actual base ISO is 100, so the daylight shots were taken at ISO 200, and also handheld. I thought I would reshoot them today, but the weather did not cooperate, and I don't know when the next sunny day might be. In the meantime, its almost officially winter, so I feel like every day I wait the light gets more "wintery." I made a DCP myself using Dcamprof though and it seems to work pretty well, so I'm posting these now in case they're of interest. I included the corresponding JPEGs in case you want to look at the metadata. Here's the link: https://filebin.net/ju4pgqwdpqwe3bry

Cheers

Beep6581 commented 4 years ago

@MeaningfulName-69 ISO200 hand-held for daylight should be fine, but StdA shots must use a tripod. The files have expired - ping me if you re-upload them.

MeaningfulName-69 commented 4 years ago

@Beep6581 here they are: https://filebin.net/gd8ibw3p41e5fqzf The StdA shots were taken on a tripod Cheers

Beep6581 commented 4 years ago

The shots look good.

Adobe DNG Converter 12.1 does not support the Canon EOS RP CR3 yet, so instead of Lumariver Profile Designer I will create a dual-illuminant profile using RawTherapee and dcamprof.

Beep6581 commented 4 years ago

morgan@alpha ~/programs/dcamprof-1.0.6 $ ~/scripts/generateDCP -c "Canon EOS RP" -r ccnew 

argyll-scanin tungsten ----------------------------------------

Input file 'tungsten.tif': w=1507, h=1010, d = 3, bpp = 16
Data input file 'data-examples/cc24_ref-new.cie'
Data output file 'tungsten.ti3'
Chart reference file '/usr/share/argyllcms/ref/ColorChecker.cht'
Creating diagnostic tiff file 'tungsten-diag.tif'
About to allocate scanrd_ object
Verbosity = 2, flags = 0x62af9
About to read input tiff file and discover groups
adivval = 0.932442
About to calculate edge lines
327 useful edges out of 2368
About to calculate perspective correction
Perspective correction factors = 0.000004 -0.000001 753.500000 505.000000
About to calculate rotation
Mean angle = 0.168549
Standard deviation = 1.994422
Robust mean angle = 0.278184 from 270 lines
About to calculate feature information
About to read reference feature information
Read of chart reference file succeeded
About to match features
Checking xx
Checking yy
Checking xy
Checking yx
Checking xix
Checking yiy
Checking xiy
Checking yix
Axis matches for each possible orientation:
  0: xx  = 0.264479, yy  = 0.199478, xx.sc  = 0.215439, yy.sc  = 0.220530
 90: xiy = 0.118457, yx  = 0.244420, xiy.sc = 0.422348, yx.sc  = 0.218649
180: xix = 0.259318, yiy = 0.191912, xix.sc = 0.215439, yiy.sc = 0.220530
270: xy  = 0.116947, yix = 0.238495, xy.sc  = 0.417740, yix.sc = 0.218649
r0 = 0.323624, r90 = 0.140613, r180 = 0.315161, r270 = 0.139030
There are 2 candidate rotations:
cc = 0.323624, irot = 0.278184, xoff = -18.895606, yoff = -1.747776, xscale = 4.641683, yscale = 4.534535
cc = 0.315161, irot = 180.278184, xoff = -1522.143082, yoff = -1025.324318, xscale = 4.641683, yscale = 4.534535
About to compute match transform for rotation 0.278184 deg.
About to setup value scanrdg boxes
About to read raster values
About to compute expected value correlation
About to compute match transform for rotation 180.278184 deg.
About to setup value scanrdg boxes
About to read raster values
About to compute expected value correlation
Expected value distance values are:
0, rot 0.278184: 3066.961348
1, rot 180.278184: 4202.330071
Chosen rotation 0.278184 deg. as best
About to compute final match transform
Improve match
About to setup value scanrdg boxes
About to read raster values
About to write diag file
Writing output values to file 'tungsten.ti3'

make-profile tungsten ----------------------------------------

Reading target...
Camera G on darkest patch(es) is 10.3% lighter compared to observer Y.
  Y dynamic range is 4.82 stops, G dynamic range is 4.68 stops, difference
  0.14 stops. A small difference is normal, while a large indicates that there
  is glare.
Generating values for the calibration illuminant StdA and for D50...
Re-generating target reference XYZ values for illuminant StdA...
Re-generating target reference XYZ values for illuminant D50...
CAT02 was applied on XYZ values to transform illuminant "StdA" to "D50".
Warning: auto-selected neutral patch (D02) is not the lightest, as the
  lightest patch is considerably off-white. That is if you later use the target
  for white balancing you should use the indicated patch instead of the
  lightest.
The most neutral patch (D02) differs 1.12 DE from actual neutral,
  transforming target reference XYZ values to match, using CAT02.
Automatic LUT relaxation weights assigned.
Making camera profile...
Finding a camera raw RGB to CIE XYZ matrix for calibration illuminant StdA...
Whitest patch in target (D02) differs DE 0.95 from calibration illuminant,
  close enough to calculate whitepoint preservation.
Inverting to get ColorMatrix:
  {
    "ColorMatrix1": [
      [  1.116091, -0.305163,  0.000873 ],
      [ -0.532256,  1.514837,  0.460999 ],
      [ -0.079094,  0.197401,  0.771977 ]
    ]
  }
Matrix patch match average DE 2.24, DE LCh 1.09 0.98 1.31
                    median DE 2.23, DE LCh 0.98 0.70 0.92
                       p90 DE 4.29, DE LCh 2.40 2.32 3.02
                       max DE 5.14, DE LCh 3.76 2.87 4.51
ColorMatrix optimal white balance for target: 0.841872,1,0.35206 (m1.18783,1,2.84043)
Finding a camera raw RGB to CIE XYZ matrix for connection space illuminant D50...
  {
    "LUTMatrix1": [
      [  0.665959,  0.137131,  0.161129 ],
      [  0.262494,  0.690169,  0.047337 ],
      [  0.000271,  0.027175,  0.797756 ]
    ]
  }
LUTMatrix optimal white balance for target: 0.837656,1,0.350206 (m1.19381,1,2.85546)
Matrix patch match average DE 5.47, DE LCh 1.81 4.47 2.71
                    median DE 5.21, DE LCh 1.56 4.18 2.04
                       p90 DE 10.55, DE LCh 3.68 8.11 6.79
                       max DE 13.48, DE LCh 6.17 11.73 7.89
Finding a camera raw RGB to CIE XYZ matrix for connection space illuminant D50...
  Y row limit set to -0.2.
Applying white-balance to get ForwardMatrix:
  {
    "ForwardMatrix1": [
      [  0.803407, -0.012940,  0.173752 ],
      [  0.278111,  0.788268, -0.066379 ],
      [  0.051259, -0.464675,  1.238618 ]
    ]
  }
ForwardMatrix optimal white balance for target: 0.837656,1,0.350206 (m1.19381,1,2.85546)
Matrix patch match average DE 2.37, DE LCh 1.32 1.02 1.27
                    median DE 2.43, DE LCh 0.66 0.87 0.87
                       p90 DE 5.18, DE LCh 3.18 2.44 2.95
                       max DE 5.29, DE LCh 4.46 2.76 4.22
Making 2.5D chromaticity-addressed lookup table for XYZ correction...
4.17% of the patches was put in a chromaticity group due to nearby neighbor.
  25.00% of the patches was removed due to being nearby the whitepoint.
  Largest chromaticity group contains 2 patches. Patch count reduced from
  24 to 17. Note that patch matching cannot reach 100% when chromaticity
  groups are formed, as the LUT matches the average within a group.
Lightness axis is disabled. Since lightness affects chroma, the LUT chroma
  control points are recalculated to better match the uncorrected lightness.
  A residual error of up to about 0.2 DE is expected.
Relaxing LUT stretch with up to 4.00 DE. Iterating over 17 patches...
  Lightness correction is disabled.
Average DE for the 17 tested patches increased to 2.50 after LUT relax.
  17.65% could do without LUT correction.
Native LUT patch match average DE 2.12, DE LCh 1.33 0.92 0.93
                        median DE 1.92, DE LCh 1.07 0.69 1.01
                           p90 DE 3.80, DE LCh 3.18 2.91 1.65
                           max DE 5.37, DE LCh 4.46 3.40 2.08
5 worst patches for Overall DE:
  C04 RGB 0.524 0.509 0.088 XYZref 0.665 0.678 0.106 XYZcam 0.547 0.566 0.118 sRGB #FED13C #E7C34F DE 5.37 DE LCh -3.98 -3.40 +1.19 (light strong yellow)
  C06 RGB 0.107 0.267 0.140 XYZref 0.127 0.180 0.323 XYZcam 0.165 0.219 0.377 sRGB #0098BC #009BC3 DE 4.82 DE LCh +4.46 -0.87 +1.56 (blue)
  C03 RGB 0.321 0.109 0.031 XYZref 0.278 0.161 0.048 XYZcam 0.318 0.187 0.067 sRGB #CC373F #D73F4C DE 3.80 DE LCh +3.18 -0.11 -2.08 (strong red)
  B06 RGB 0.553 0.419 0.068 XYZref 0.565 0.511 0.086 XYZcam 0.566 0.515 0.123 sRGB #FAAD3C #F7AF57 DE 3.31 DE LCh +0.20 -2.91 -1.57 (light strong orange)
  B05 RGB 0.358 0.484 0.096 XYZref 0.362 0.476 0.110 XYZcam 0.389 0.483 0.144 sRGB #A0C44E #AAC262 DE 3.28 DE LCh +0.30 -3.10 -1.01 (light strong yellow-green)
5 worst patches for Lightness DE:
  C06 RGB 0.107 0.267 0.140 XYZref 0.127 0.180 0.323 XYZcam 0.165 0.219 0.377 sRGB #0098BC #009BC3 DE 4.82 DE LCh +4.46 -0.87 +1.56 (blue)
  C04 RGB 0.524 0.509 0.088 XYZref 0.665 0.678 0.106 XYZcam 0.547 0.566 0.118 sRGB #FED13C #E7C34F DE 5.37 DE LCh -3.98 -3.40 +1.19 (light strong yellow)
  C03 RGB 0.321 0.109 0.031 XYZref 0.278 0.161 0.048 XYZcam 0.318 0.187 0.067 sRGB #CC373F #D73F4C DE 3.80 DE LCh +3.18 -0.11 -2.08 (strong red)
  A03 RGB 0.153 0.231 0.110 XYZref 0.175 0.189 0.270 XYZcam 0.198 0.212 0.290 sRGB #547C9F #5F82A4 DE 2.78 DE LCh +2.64 -0.69 +0.32 (purple-blue)
  C05 RGB 0.388 0.203 0.094 XYZref 0.383 0.244 0.239 XYZcam 0.416 0.272 0.261 sRGB #D85B96 #DF639B DE 2.43 DE LCh +2.39 -0.34 +0.26 (purple-red)
5 worst patches for Chroma DE:
  C04 RGB 0.524 0.509 0.088 XYZref 0.665 0.678 0.106 XYZcam 0.547 0.566 0.118 sRGB #FED13C #E7C34F DE 5.37 DE LCh -3.98 -3.40 +1.19 (light strong yellow)
  B05 RGB 0.358 0.484 0.096 XYZref 0.362 0.476 0.110 XYZcam 0.389 0.483 0.144 sRGB #A0C44E #AAC262 DE 3.28 DE LCh +0.30 -3.10 -1.01 (light strong yellow-green)
  B06 RGB 0.553 0.419 0.068 XYZref 0.565 0.511 0.086 XYZcam 0.566 0.515 0.123 sRGB #FAAD3C #F7AF57 DE 3.31 DE LCh +0.20 -2.91 -1.57 (light strong orange)
  B01 RGB 0.483 0.286 0.049 XYZref 0.475 0.370 0.067 XYZcam 0.494 0.388 0.088 sRGB #F4873B #F68B4A DE 2.38 DE LCh +1.07 -1.33 -1.65 (strong orange)
  C02 RGB 0.129 0.261 0.066 XYZref 0.146 0.233 0.098 XYZcam 0.152 0.236 0.113 sRGB #3B9558 #3E9560 DE 1.80 DE LCh +0.30 -1.25 +1.26 (green)
5 worst patches for Hue DE:
  C03 RGB 0.321 0.109 0.031 XYZref 0.278 0.161 0.048 XYZcam 0.318 0.187 0.067 sRGB #CC373F #D73F4C DE 3.80 DE LCh +3.18 -0.11 -2.08 (strong red)
  B03 RGB 0.390 0.180 0.056 XYZref 0.376 0.238 0.111 XYZcam 0.400 0.261 0.140 sRGB #E25663 #E55F70 DE 2.94 DE LCh +2.05 -0.95 -1.87 (red)
  B01 RGB 0.483 0.286 0.049 XYZref 0.475 0.370 0.067 XYZcam 0.494 0.388 0.088 sRGB #F4873B #F68B4A DE 2.38 DE LCh +1.07 -1.33 -1.65 (strong orange)
  B06 RGB 0.553 0.419 0.068 XYZref 0.565 0.511 0.086 XYZcam 0.566 0.515 0.123 sRGB #FAAD3C #F7AF57 DE 3.31 DE LCh +0.20 -2.91 -1.57 (light strong orange)
  C06 RGB 0.107 0.267 0.140 XYZref 0.127 0.180 0.323 XYZcam 0.165 0.219 0.377 sRGB #0098BC #009BC3 DE 4.82 DE LCh +4.46 -0.87 +1.56 (blue)
5 best patches for Overall DE:
  D02 RGB 0.546 0.652 0.228 XYZref 0.629 0.652 0.538 XYZcam 0.629 0.652 0.538 sRGB #D3D3D3 #D3D3D3 DE 0.00 DE LCh +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 (gray 80%)
  D01 RGB 0.844 0.987 0.339 XYZref 0.968 1.000 0.801 XYZcam 0.959 0.989 0.788 sRGB #FEFEFB #FEFDF9 DE 0.55 DE LCh -0.24 +0.47 -0.15 (white)
  A05 RGB 0.236 0.261 0.130 XYZref 0.271 0.252 0.349 XYZcam 0.280 0.260 0.354 sRGB #8884B2 #8B86B4 DE 0.91 DE LCh +0.66 -0.07 +0.60 (purple-blue)
  D03 RGB 0.336 0.407 0.143 XYZref 0.388 0.403 0.334 XYZcam 0.388 0.405 0.338 sRGB #A9AAAA #A8ABAB DE 0.94 DE LCh +0.09 +0.94 -0.09 (gray 70%)
  B02 RGB 0.087 0.143 0.099 XYZref 0.131 0.119 0.304 XYZcam 0.132 0.123 0.296 sRGB #355FAA #3561A8 DE 0.97 DE LCh +0.54 -0.90 -1.33 (purple-blue)
Writing output to "tungsten.json"...
Complete!

argyll-scanin daylight ----------------------------------------

Input file 'daylight.tif': w=1373, h=881, d = 3, bpp = 16
Data input file 'data-examples/cc24_ref-new.cie'
Data output file 'daylight.ti3'
Chart reference file '/usr/share/argyllcms/ref/ColorChecker.cht'
Creating diagnostic tiff file 'daylight-diag.tif'
About to allocate scanrd_ object
Verbosity = 2, flags = 0x62af9
About to read input tiff file and discover groups
adivval = 1.000000
About to calculate edge lines
274 useful edges out of 652
About to calculate perspective correction
Perspective correction factors = -0.000006 0.000029 1385.170684 440.500000
About to calculate rotation
Mean angle = -0.054333
Standard deviation = 0.805022
Robust mean angle = -0.001341 from 228 lines
About to calculate feature information
About to read reference feature information
Read of chart reference file succeeded
About to match features
Checking xx
Checking yy
Checking xy
Checking yx
Checking xix
Checking yiy
Checking xiy
Checking yix
Axis matches for each possible orientation:
  0: xx  = 0.294145, yy  = 0.287201, xx.sc  = 0.232728, yy.sc  = 0.255455
 90: xiy = 0.217679, yx  = 0.268358, xiy.sc = 0.482944, yx.sc  = 0.467412
180: xix = 0.279454, yiy = 0.265218, xix.sc = 0.233000, yiy.sc = 0.255556
270: xy  = 0.209589, yix = 0.286936, xy.sc  = 0.482944, yix.sc = 0.229751
r0 = 0.374530, r90 = 0.334430, r180 = 0.351267, r270 = 0.169042
There are 3 candidate rotations:
cc = 0.374530, irot = -0.001341, xoff = -45.741835, yoff = 11.667866, xscale = 4.296854, yscale = 3.914590
cc = 0.334430, irot = 89.998659, xoff = -719.288999, yoff = 854.820852, xscale = 2.070635, yscale = 2.139439
cc = 0.351267, irot = 179.998659, xoff = -1381.570681, yoff = -897.987777, xscale = 4.291849, yscale = 3.913033
About to compute match transform for rotation -0.001341 deg.
About to setup value scanrdg boxes
About to read raster values
About to compute expected value correlation
About to compute match transform for rotation 89.998659 deg.
About to setup value scanrdg boxes
About to read raster values
About to compute expected value correlation
About to compute match transform for rotation 179.998659 deg.
About to setup value scanrdg boxes
About to read raster values
About to compute expected value correlation
Expected value distance values are:
0, rot -0.001341: 3381.198165
1, rot 89.998659: 4917.470034
2, rot 179.998659: 4160.360916
Chosen rotation -0.001341 deg. as best
About to compute final match transform
Improve match
About to setup value scanrdg boxes
About to read raster values
About to write diag file
Writing output values to file 'daylight.ti3'

make-profile daylight ----------------------------------------

Reading target...
Camera G on darkest patch(es) is -1.7% lighter compared to observer Y.
  Y dynamic range is 4.82 stops, G dynamic range is 4.84 stops, difference
  -0.02 stops. A small difference is normal, while a large indicates that there
  is glare.
Generating values for the calibration illuminant D50...
Re-generating target reference XYZ values for illuminant D50...
Warning: auto-selected neutral patch (D02) is not the lightest, as the
  lightest patch is considerably off-white. That is if you later use the target
  for white balancing you should use the indicated patch instead of the
  lightest.
The most neutral patch (D02) differs 1.20 DE from actual neutral,
  transforming target reference XYZ values to match, using CAT02.
Automatic LUT relaxation weights assigned.
Making camera profile...
Finding a camera raw RGB to CIE XYZ matrix for calibration illuminant D50...
Whitest patch in target (D02) differs DE 1.20 from calibration illuminant,
  close enough to calculate whitepoint preservation.
Inverting to get ColorMatrix:
  {
    "ColorMatrix1": [
      [  0.605656, -0.073646, -0.071554 ],
      [ -0.489831,  1.219166,  0.307557 ],
      [ -0.110237,  0.215867,  0.689670 ]
    ]
  }
Matrix patch match average DE 1.47, DE LCh 1.22 0.42 0.52
                    median DE 1.46, DE LCh 0.86 0.31 0.34
                       p90 DE 2.96, DE LCh 2.84 0.77 1.38
                       max DE 4.73, DE LCh 4.21 1.35 1.69
ColorMatrix optimal white balance for target: 0.450996,1,0.678245 (m2.21732,1,1.47439)
Finding a camera raw RGB to CIE XYZ matrix for connection space illuminant D50...
  {
    "LUTMatrix1": [
      [  0.630117,  0.122453,  0.211648 ],
      [  0.293813,  0.640780,  0.065407 ],
      [  0.000090,  0.014961,  0.810150 ]
    ]
  }
LUTMatrix optimal white balance for target: 0.449495,1,0.673293 (m2.22472,1,1.48524)
Matrix patch match average DE 5.46, DE LCh 2.46 4.45 2.36
                    median DE 5.58, DE LCh 1.76 4.70 2.05
                       p90 DE 8.88, DE LCh 5.96 8.09 5.62
                       max DE 12.76, DE LCh 7.80 9.46 8.76
Finding a camera raw RGB to CIE XYZ matrix for connection space illuminant D50...
  Y row limit set to -0.2.
Applying white-balance to get ForwardMatrix:
  {
    "ForwardMatrix1": [
      [  0.816158, -0.047196,  0.195256 ],
      [  0.342317,  0.779300, -0.121617 ],
      [  0.051288, -0.360638,  1.134551 ]
    ]
  }
ForwardMatrix optimal white balance for target: 0.449495,1,0.673293 (m2.22472,1,1.48524)
Matrix patch match average DE 1.81, DE LCh 1.54 0.50 0.59
                    median DE 1.78, DE LCh 0.93 0.35 0.44
                       p90 DE 3.38, DE LCh 3.24 1.15 1.41
                       max DE 5.39, DE LCh 5.14 1.38 1.77
Making 2.5D chromaticity-addressed lookup table for XYZ correction...
4.17% of the patches was put in a chromaticity group due to nearby neighbor.
  25.00% of the patches was removed due to being nearby the whitepoint.
  Largest chromaticity group contains 2 patches. Patch count reduced from
  24 to 17. Note that patch matching cannot reach 100% when chromaticity
  groups are formed, as the LUT matches the average within a group.
Lightness axis is disabled. Since lightness affects chroma, the LUT chroma
  control points are recalculated to better match the uncorrected lightness.
  A residual error of up to about 0.2 DE is expected.
Relaxing LUT stretch with up to 3.63 DE. Iterating over 17 patches...
  Lightness correction is disabled.
Average DE for the 17 tested patches increased to 2.38 after LUT relax.
  70.59% could do without LUT correction.
Native LUT patch match average DE 1.96, DE LCh 1.54 0.80 0.50
                        median DE 1.79, DE LCh 1.13 0.47 0.50
                           p90 DE 3.38, DE LCh 3.24 2.08 0.93
                           max DE 6.09, DE LCh 4.80 3.74 1.27
5 worst patches for Overall DE:
  C04 RGB 0.275 0.432 0.108 XYZref 0.655 0.664 0.081 XYZcam 0.524 0.535 0.092 sRGB #FECF1E #E5BC3D DE 6.09 DE LCh -4.80 -3.74 +0.26 (light vivid yellow)
  C03 RGB 0.148 0.085 0.043 XYZref 0.238 0.143 0.045 XYZcam 0.278 0.172 0.059 sRGB #BD3A3D #C94546 DE 3.78 DE LCh +3.77 -0.11 -0.19 (red)
  C06 RGB 0.057 0.309 0.274 XYZref 0.142 0.203 0.332 XYZcam 0.168 0.234 0.356 sRGB #009DBC #00A1BE DE 3.38 DE LCh +3.24 -0.64 -0.75 (blue)
  B05 RGB 0.205 0.451 0.135 XYZref 0.387 0.492 0.093 XYZcam 0.396 0.480 0.121 sRGB #ADC53F #B2C055 DE 3.32 DE LCh -0.55 -3.14 -0.93 (light strong yellow-green)
  B02 RGB 0.051 0.190 0.241 XYZref 0.137 0.124 0.330 XYZcam 0.154 0.144 0.343 sRGB #3160B1 #3C69B4 DE 2.83 DE LCh +2.73 -1.15 -1.27 (purple-blue)
5 worst patches for Lightness DE:
  C04 RGB 0.275 0.432 0.108 XYZref 0.655 0.664 0.081 XYZcam 0.524 0.535 0.092 sRGB #FECF1E #E5BC3D DE 6.09 DE LCh -4.80 -3.74 +0.26 (light vivid yellow)
  C03 RGB 0.148 0.085 0.043 XYZref 0.238 0.143 0.045 XYZcam 0.278 0.172 0.059 sRGB #BD3A3D #C94546 DE 3.78 DE LCh +3.77 -0.11 -0.19 (red)
  C06 RGB 0.057 0.309 0.274 XYZref 0.142 0.203 0.332 XYZcam 0.168 0.234 0.356 sRGB #009DBC #00A1BE DE 3.38 DE LCh +3.24 -0.64 -0.75 (blue)
  B02 RGB 0.051 0.190 0.241 XYZref 0.137 0.124 0.330 XYZcam 0.154 0.144 0.343 sRGB #3160B1 #3C69B4 DE 2.83 DE LCh +2.73 -1.15 -1.27 (purple-blue)
  B04 RGB 0.049 0.082 0.089 XYZref 0.091 0.069 0.112 XYZcam 0.110 0.085 0.129 sRGB #5D3E6B #674672 DE 2.79 DE LCh +2.72 -0.14 +0.63 (dark purple)
5 worst patches for Chroma DE:
  C04 RGB 0.275 0.432 0.108 XYZref 0.655 0.664 0.081 XYZcam 0.524 0.535 0.092 sRGB #FECF1E #E5BC3D DE 6.09 DE LCh -4.80 -3.74 +0.26 (light vivid yellow)
  B05 RGB 0.205 0.451 0.135 XYZref 0.387 0.492 0.093 XYZcam 0.396 0.480 0.121 sRGB #ADC53F #B2C055 DE 3.32 DE LCh -0.55 -3.14 -0.93 (light strong yellow-green)
  B06 RGB 0.284 0.342 0.090 XYZref 0.543 0.487 0.070 XYZcam 0.531 0.477 0.090 sRGB #F8A92F #F3A843 DE 2.43 DE LCh -0.43 -2.08 -1.19 (light strong orange)
  B02 RGB 0.051 0.190 0.241 XYZref 0.137 0.124 0.330 XYZcam 0.154 0.144 0.343 sRGB #3160B1 #3C69B4 DE 2.83 DE LCh +2.73 -1.15 -1.27 (purple-blue)
  C02 RGB 0.084 0.279 0.108 XYZref 0.166 0.254 0.088 XYZcam 0.177 0.263 0.100 sRGB #519950 #579B57 DE 1.36 DE LCh +0.79 -1.08 +0.21 (yellow-green)
5 worst patches for Hue DE:
  B02 RGB 0.051 0.190 0.241 XYZref 0.137 0.124 0.330 XYZcam 0.154 0.144 0.343 sRGB #3160B1 #3C69B4 DE 2.83 DE LCh +2.73 -1.15 -1.27 (purple-blue)
  B06 RGB 0.284 0.342 0.090 XYZref 0.543 0.487 0.070 XYZcam 0.531 0.477 0.090 sRGB #F8A92F #F3A843 DE 2.43 DE LCh -0.43 -2.08 -1.19 (light strong orange)
  B05 RGB 0.205 0.451 0.135 XYZref 0.387 0.492 0.093 XYZcam 0.396 0.480 0.121 sRGB #ADC53F #B2C055 DE 3.32 DE LCh -0.55 -3.14 -0.93 (light strong yellow-green)
  C01 RGB 0.025 0.107 0.158 XYZref 0.078 0.064 0.232 XYZcam 0.086 0.073 0.235 sRGB #004598 #154998 DE 1.79 DE LCh +1.65 -1.04 -0.77 (dark purple-blue)
  C06 RGB 0.057 0.309 0.274 XYZref 0.142 0.203 0.332 XYZcam 0.168 0.234 0.356 sRGB #009DBC #00A1BE DE 3.38 DE LCh +3.24 -0.64 -0.75 (blue)
5 best patches for Overall DE:
  D02 RGB 0.295 0.656 0.442 XYZref 0.633 0.656 0.541 XYZcam 0.633 0.656 0.541 sRGB #D3D3D3 #D3D3D3 DE 0.00 DE LCh +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 (gray 80%)
  D06 RGB 0.015 0.034 0.023 XYZref 0.034 0.035 0.030 XYZcam 0.032 0.033 0.029 sRGB #343435 #323334 DE 0.62 DE LCh -0.51 +0.26 -0.25 (gray 20%)
  D04 RGB 0.096 0.213 0.143 XYZref 0.201 0.208 0.173 XYZcam 0.205 0.213 0.174 sRGB #7D7D7E #7F7F7E DE 0.69 DE LCh +0.49 +0.16 -0.45 (gray 50%)
  A03 RGB 0.076 0.238 0.216 XYZref 0.184 0.198 0.283 XYZcam 0.189 0.204 0.287 sRGB #577EA2 #5980A3 DE 0.80 DE LCh +0.72 -0.24 -0.37 (purple-blue)
  A04 RGB 0.065 0.149 0.065 XYZref 0.126 0.152 0.059 XYZcam 0.130 0.154 0.063 sRGB #657144 #677147 DE 0.84 DE LCh +0.27 -0.71 -0.36 (yellow-green)
Writing output to "daylight.json"...
Complete!

make-dcp ----------------------------------------

Camera: Canon EOS RP
Copyright: RawTherapee CC0
Curve: acr
TRO: neutral
Gamut: none

Enter DCP filename suffix, if any:

Generating 2.5D HueSatMap with 90x30 = 2700 entries...done!
The tone curve's contrast value is 1.30 (=> auto chroma scaling value 1.121)
Generating 3D LookTable with 90x30x30 = 81000 entries for the neutral tone reproduction operator...
  0%..10%..20%..30%..40%..50%..60%..70%..80%..90%..100%
Generating 2.5D HueSatMap with 90x30 = 2700 entries...done!
Writing output to "Canon EOS RP.dcp"...
Complete!

screenshot_20200124_002347 screenshot_20200124_002510

Beep6581 commented 4 years ago

Further improvements possible once Adobe DNG Converter supports this camera.

Beep6581 commented 4 years ago

@MeaningfulName-69 since RawTherapee does not currently support CR3 metadata, it will not auto-detect this DCP, so you must apply it manually. Create a new PP3 which automatically uses this DCP. http://rawpedia.rawtherapee.com/Creating_processing_profiles_for_general_use

Beep6581 commented 4 years ago

screenshot_20200124_003419

MeaningfulName-69 commented 4 years ago

Great, it works for me, it makes a lot better looking starting point than Adobe Standard, cheers.

rs-gh-asdf commented 1 year ago

Further improvements possible once Adobe DNG Converter supports this camera.

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this @Beep6581, but it appears that Adobe Camera Raw now supports the RP. Is it possible to update the "profile" for this camera?

Beep6581 commented 1 year ago

@rs-gh-asdf have you noticed any shortcomings? If so, please open a new issue.