Open ohickl opened 1 year ago
Hello,
I pushed an issue to bug_fixes
branch that should address this. Let me know if the changes works for you. Here's how I tested:
$ cat r1.fq
@r1
TGAATGCGAACTCCGGGACGCTCAGTAATGTGACGATAGCTGAAAACTGTACGATAAACNGTACGCTGAGGGCAGAAAAAATCGTCGGGGACATTNTAAAGGCGGCGAGCGCGGCTTTTCCG
+
+"@6<:27(F&5)9)"B:%B+A-%5A?2$HCB0B+0=D<7E/<.03#!.F77@6B==?C"7>;))%;,3-$.A06+<-1/@@?,26">=?*@'0;$:;??G+:#+(A?9+10!8!?()?7C>
$ cat r2.fq
@r1
GAATACTGGCGGATTACCGGGGAAGCTGGAGC
+
EDCCCBAAAA@@@@?>===<;;9:99987776
$ ./bowtie2 -x example/index/lambda_virus -1 r1.fq -2 r2.fq --un-mates out
1 reads; of these:
1 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
1 (100.00%) aligned concordantly 0 times
0 (0.00%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
0 (0.00%) aligned concordantly >1 times
----
1 pairs aligned concordantly 0 times; of these:
0 (0.00%) aligned discordantly 1 time
----
1 pairs aligned 0 times concordantly or discordantly; of these:
2 mates make up the pairs; of these:
1 (50.00%) aligned 0 times
1 (50.00%) aligned exactly 1 time
0 (0.00%) aligned >1 times
50.00% overall alignment rate
@HD VN:1.5 SO:unsorted GO:query
@SQ SN:gi|9626243|ref|NC_001416.1| LN:48502
@PG ID:bowtie2 PN:bowtie2 VN:2.5.0 CL:"/bowtie2/bowtie2-align-s --wrapper basic-0 -x example/index/lambda_virus --passthrough -1 r1.fq -2 r2.fq"
r1 73 gi|9626243|ref|NC_001416.1| 18401 42 122M = 18401 0 TGAATGCGAACTCCGGGACGCTCAGTAATGTGACGATAGCTGAAAACTGTACGATAAACNGTACGCTGAGGGCAGAAAAAATCGTCGGGGACATTNTAAAGGCGGCGAGCGCGGCTTTTCCG +"@6<:27(F&5)9)"B:%B+A-%5A?2$HCB0B+0=D<7E/<.03#!.F77@6B==?C"7>;))%;,3-$.A06+<-1/@@?,26">=?*@'0;$:;??G+:#+(A?9+10!8!?()?7C> AS:i:-5 XN:i:0 XM:i:3 XO:i:0 XG:i:0 NM:i:3 MD:Z:59G13G21G26 YT:Z:UP
r0 133 gi|9626243|ref|NC_001416.1| 18401 0 * = 18401 0 GAATACTGGCGGATTACCGGGGAAGCTGGAGC EDCCCBAAAA@@@@?>===<;;9:99987776 YT:Z:UP
$ samtools flags 73
0x49 73 PAIRED,MUNMAP,READ1
$ samtools flags 133
0x85 133 PAIRED,UNMAP,READ2
$ cat out.1
$ cat out.2
@r1
GAATACTGGCGGATTACCGGGGAAGCTGGAGC
+
EDCCCBAAAA@@@@?>===<;;9:99987776
Hi I was wondering if it was possible to write only the unmapped read of a read pair to the unmapped output. It would be fine for me if the pairs map discordantly or just one does. At the moment I would 'lose' the entire pair with
--un-conc
, whereas--un-mates
from #254 doesn't seem to work:This is my approach for fw and rv, respectively, atm:
Or would it work fine doing something like, e.g.:
Not sure if this would create any problems, since the pair information is lost.
Best
Oskar