Closed FFroehlich closed 2 years ago
@elbaraim I think that this is related to issue #135 - the "original" d2d model contained these priors.
@elbaraim I think that this is related to issue #135 - the "original" d2d model contained these priors.
Hi @stephanmg thanks for linking the issue! However this only would explain the normal prior :)
Hi @FFroehlich why were the uniform priors added to this model?
I wasn't sure whether I could just leave those rows empty, is that valid PEtab?
I wasn't sure whether I could just leave those rows empty, is that valid PEtab?
I guess so 🙈 since this other model is in the current benchmark collection (therefore undergo all checks) https://github.com/Benchmarking-Initiative/Benchmark-Models-PEtab/blob/master/Benchmark-Models/Raimundez_PCB2020/parameters_Raimundez_PCB2020.tsv 😄
I wasn't sure whether I could just leave those rows empty, is that valid PEtab?
I guess so 🙈 since this other model is in the current benchmark collection (therefore undergo all checks) https://github.com/Benchmarking-Initiative/Benchmark-Models-PEtab/blob/master/Benchmark-Models/Raimundez_PCB2020/parameters_Raimundez_PCB2020.tsv 😄
fixed!
Hi @FFroehlich why were the uniform priors added to this model?