Add wrapper gateway contract

[thorseldon]

Users can directly use the original Koda to borrow, no need to care about the wrapper underhood.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 96.15% and project coverage change: +0.35 :tada:

Comparison is base (69d8912) 90.99% compared to head (c7986e7) 91.34%.

:exclamation: Current head c7986e7 differs from pull request most recent head a099156. Consider uploading reports for the commit a099156 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #89 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 90.99% 91.34% +0.35% ========================================== Files 33 34 +1 Lines 2465 2647 +182 Branches 374 407 +33 ========================================== + Hits 2243 2418 +175 - Misses 222 229 +7 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/BendDAO/bend-lending-protocol/pull/89?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=BendDAO) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [contracts/protocol/WrapperGateway.sol](https://codecov.io/gh/BendDAO/bend-lending-protocol/pull/89?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=BendDAO#diff-Y29udHJhY3RzL3Byb3RvY29sL1dyYXBwZXJHYXRld2F5LnNvbA==) | `96.15% <96.15%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=BendDAO). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=BendDAO)

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[thorseldon]

• [x] Re-Entrancy: We should forbid the function re-entry in default, every method which will write the state MUST have the non-reentrant modifier, except there’s a special reason why we must do this.
• [x] Ownership Check: The method should be called by everyone (permissionless) or can only be called by the caller in the whitelist or administrator (owner).
• [x] Administration Privileges Check
• [x] Unexpected Ether
• [x] Unexpected ERC20/ERC721/ERC1155
• [x] Delegatecall: The delegate called target contract code will run in the current contract context, especially the self-destruct opcode will destroy the contract code.
• [x] Arbitrary Contract Call: If you allow users to call an arbitrary contract, the malicious hacker will try to implement an attacking contract and call it.
• [x] Arbitrary Parameter Call: If you allow users to call the contract with arbitrary parameters, especially the method, the malicious hacker will try to call the method which can transfer the asset, etc. safeTransferFrom.
• [x] Uninitialized Storage or Variables
• [x] MEVBot: Front Running