search

BenedictChannn / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Find expense date UG specification weird #9

Open BenedictChannn opened 8 months ago

BenedictChannn commented 8 months ago

image.png

In the UG, it was told that users can search for expenses with months as well, and provided MM/yyyy as a template. But "/date Oct/2023" was also allowed. Would it be better to specify in the UG that writing the month itself also works

nus-pe-bot commented 8 months ago

Team's Response

No details provided by team.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Find expense format for date can be clearer

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

image.png

Using Oct/2023 also works so other than MM/yyyy, can probably specify that usage of Oct works too

[original: nus-cs2113-AY2324S1/pe-interim#301] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

thanks for pointing this out but this is not our priority and the main focus for this function

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

## :question: Issue response Team chose [`response.NotInScope`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** For the same reasons as the duplicate, providing a UG that is unclear is a clear error. The UG is meant to provide comprehensive details for users so that they can use your application.