search

Beniko95J / MLF-VO

Multi-Layer Fusion Visual Odometry
GNU General Public License v3.0
20 stars 3 forks source link

A general question #3

Closed rginjapan closed 2 years ago

rginjapan commented 2 years ago

你好，想问一个关于Channel exchange 的问题，A和B 做 CE后， 假设A变得越来越important，B越来越不important，为什么最后还是fusionA和B呢， 而不是只用A？？

arkinrc commented 2 years ago

@rginjapan communicate only in English please, so that every can understand questions and reply accordingly. Thanks

rginjapan commented 2 years ago

@arkinrc Thanks for being interested in my question, lol. I am right now implementing CE to my framework and using this repo. as reference. If I understand correctly, Channel Exchange will make one feature vector becomes more and more important but the other one becomes more and more meaningless, why in the end of MLF-VO, it still fuse A and B together instead of using the more important feature vector. As shown in Fig2(a), after the last CE, there are still using information from both streams.

rginjapan commented 2 years ago

A communciation with CEN author is here, sorry is in Chinese @arkinrc