Open agitter opened 5 years ago
I like how they have a bunch of different architectures and problems represented in their repo. Their notebooks are less than ideal, but I would prefer to avoid the scope creep #88 would entail.
I think #88 is a bit too ambitious and given that this is a broad audience, it will only be useful to a very very small subset because demos are very problem domain-, dataset-, and tool-specific (also it will become obsolete/become non-working very soon because tools are evolving quickly). What we could do though is make a nice flowchart though for illustrating the main steps and link them to the take-away messages from each tip.
Hi, I just found this interesting project by chance and thank you very much for your interest in our review paper!
The idea of writing an article collaboratively is very interesting to me and I am also very interested in contributing to this project if I can make any substantial contributions.
I have the following questions considering this project:
I would appreciate it if you could address my above concerns. Let me know if I need to open an issue for the above questions.
Welcome @lykaust15. The GitHub issues track TODO items and other ideas for updating the manuscript. Issue https://github.com/Benjamin-Lee/deep-rules/issues/116 has some discussion of the intended timeline. There are also open pull requests. Anyone is welcome to comment on or review a pull request.
tips.md
is only an outline, and we now have drafts of most of the tips. The actual content is in the numbered .md
files in https://github.com/Benjamin-Lee/deep-rules/tree/master/content. There is one for each tip, an intro, conclusion, etc. The Manubot system builds these files every time a pull request is merged, automatically updating the HTML output at https://benjamin-lee.github.io/deep-rules/
Some figures may be a nice addition. I'm not sure how many the article format allows. We have one cartoon about overfitting currently. You could check the issues to see if there are figure ideas you'd like to work on or create a new issue to propose a figure. Either way, I suggest discussing the idea in an issue before you spend time working on an illustration.
@agitter Got it! Thank you very much! I will review the current draft, the issues, and the pull requests, seeing the chance of contributing to this project.
Hi @lykaust15! I'm a fan of DeepSimulator (very useful since I don't have a nanopore sequencer–yet) and happy to have you onboard. Sorry for taking so long to reply; I was swamped with exams until yesterday.
@agitter has covered most of the points, but I'll try to clarify some more. With respect to the timeline, Hofstadter's law has struck again. We're behind schedule (🙍♂️) but still making progress. We don't have any official deadlines, and I do recognize that people have other research and jobs and lives to attend to. I try to work on this project every day (not expecting anyone else to at all though) to ensure we keep things moving.
The best ways to help are (in no particular order):
Welcome to the project!
@Benjamin-Lee Thank you very much for such a warm welcome! I will try my best to contribute to the project!
https://doi.org/10.1101/563601
This is a (yet another) review article that may be of interest because they provide eight examples of representative deep learning problems in biology: https://github.com/lykaust15/Deep_learning_examples It doesn't look like anyone plans to work on #88 so we could consider linking to some hands on references instead like this and #59.