Closed hitcbw closed 2 years ago
Hi, we used the same number of nodes for LARA as we did for the TUG dataset (i.e., 19) (a mistake we corrected in the revised manuscript). The nodes were: ["root_RX", "root_RY", "root_RZ", "root_TX", "root_TY", "root_TZ", "R femur_RX", "R femur_RY", "R femur_RZ", "R femur_TX", "R femur_TY", "R femur_TZ", "R tibia_RX", "R tibia_RY", "R tibia_RZ", "R tibia_TX", "R tibia_TY", "R tibia_TZ", "R foot_RX", "R foot_RY", "R foot_RZ", "R foot_TX", "R foot_TY", "R foot_TZ", "R toe_RX", "R toe_RY", "R toe_RZ", "R toe_TX", "R toe_TY", "R toe_TZ", "L femur_RX", "L femur_RY", "L femur_RZ", "L femur_TX", "L femur_TY", "L femur_TZ", "L tibia_RX", "L tibia_RY", "L tibia_RZ", "L tibia_TX", "L tibia_TY", "L tibia_TZ", "L foot_RX", "L foot_RY", "L foot_RZ", "L foot_TX", "L foot_TY", "L foot_TZ", "L toe_RX", "L toe_RY", "L toe_RZ", "L toe_TX", "L toe_TY", "L toe_TZ", "lower back_RX", "lower back_RY", "lower back_RZ", "lower back_TX", "lower back_TY", "lower back_TZ", "head_RX", "head_RY", "head_RZ", "head_TX", "head_TY", "head_TZ", "R collar_RX", "R collar_RY", "R collar_RZ", "R collar_TX", "R collar_TY", "R collar_TZ", "R humerus_RX", "R humerus_RY", "R humerus_RZ", "R humerus_TX", "R humerus_TY", "R humerus_TZ", "R elbow_RX", "R elbow_RY", "R elbow_RZ", "R elbow_TX", "R elbow_TY", "R elbow_TZ", "R wrist_RX", "R wrist_RY", "R wrist_RZ", "R wrist_TX", "R wrist_TY", "R wrist_TZ", "L collar_RX", "L collar_RY", "L collar_RZ", "L collar_TX", "L collar_TY", "L collar_TZ", "L humerus_RX", "L humerus_RY", "L humerus_RZ", "L humerus_TX", "L humerus_TY", "L humerus_TZ", "L elbow_RX", "L elbow_RY", "L elbow_RZ", "L elbow_TX", "L elbow_TY", "L elbow_TZ", "L wrist_RX", "L wrist_RY", "L wrist_RZ", "L wrist_TX", "L wrist_TY", "L wrist_TZ" ]
Apologies for the confusion.
Thanks a lot :)
Hi benjamin, Me here again :) Another question haha! I found the joint number of LARa is 39 referred to [LARa: Creating a Dataset for Human Activity Recognition in Logistics Using Semantic Attributes]. However, the norm_data_csv in OMoCap.zip (downloaded from your LARa link) owns 132/6 = 22 joints. Your report is 17 joints. It confused me a lot. Did I made a mistake somewhere?