Closed Bertinus closed 2 years ago
@josephdviviano I updated this PR to address the different points we discussed before.
thanks for working so hard on this today -- ill put in some effort tomorrow! Joseph Viviano @josephdviviano https://twitter.com/josephdviviano viviano.ca
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 6:09 PM Paul Bertin @.***> wrote:
@josephdviviano https://github.com/josephdviviano I updated this PR to address the different points we discussed before.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Bertinus/FLeCS/pull/17#issuecomment-1301385115, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA7TL2WIQFJI3XGTM5HX7IDWGLRDBANCNFSM6AAAAAARSMDCHI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
I tried to make the demo slightly more intuitive.
In particular, I tried to show which parts of the production_rate / decay_rate tensors are updated by the different methods. For example, the message passing method now returns the aggregated messages, and is used as follows:
self[tgt_n_type].production_rate += message_passing(...)