search

BetaMasaheft / Documentation

Die Schriftkultur des christlichen Äthiopiens: Eine multimediale Forschungsumgebung
3 stars 3 forks source link

Teaching of the 318 Nicene Fathers - doublette or two recensions? #2325

Open MarcinKrawczuk opened 1 year ago

MarcinKrawczuk commented 1 year ago

I have some doubts regarding a) LIT2432Teachi and b) LIT1313Discou.

At first I thought it's a doublette but then i thought that maybe LIT1313Discou should be used for the "old" recension (published in bm:Bausi2004Niceni, BTW the bibiography should be added somewhere) and LIT2432Teachi is for the later Arabic-derived version. But the usage of this work record does not support it e. g. in ESam002 the "old" one is linked to LIT2432Teachi.

Thank you for your suggestions! @thea-m @DenisNosnitsin1970 @eu-genia @CarstenHoffmannMarburg

eu-genia commented 1 year ago

Nice. The records as always are inherited from the EAe index which introduces the doublets/confusion: it does use LIT1313Discou for the old version (Bausi) and then LIT2432Teachi as generic ID for everything else. It is possibly better to use LIT2432Teachi as a generic ID for everything, specifying that two recensions exist. Additionally we could also have separate IDs for the recensions and use them in cases that are easily disambiguated (LIT1313Discou for the "Greek" one and then a new ID for the "Arabic" one, all clearly linked through relations) Are all apart from ESam002 assigned correctly if we take this hypothesis?

PS I now discovered that we also have LIT1387Fekkar for "Fǝkkāre wa-zenā za-318 rǝtuʿāna hāymānot" which is actually simply a label for the Kǝbra nagast... Am deleting

MarcinKrawczuk commented 1 year ago

Very well, so I will proceed with the following: LIT2432Teachi - generic LIT1313Discou - "old" version, transmitted in Senodos, with reference to Bausi's edition New ID - "new" version, transmitted in Haymanota abaw

(BTW I have a long list of similar cases ...)