Closed CarstenHoffmannMarburg closed 6 months ago
OK the incipit quoted seems to be an arke stanza also used in the synaxary (? maybe @thea-m can check better if she has come across it, here I found it inserted before the reading for 29 Yakatit https://www.facebook.com/100069703417025/posts/2234263313548259/ or here https://telegra.ph/%E1%89%A0%E1%88%B5%E1%88%98-%E1%8A%A0%E1%89%A5-%E1%8B%88%E1%8B%88%E1%88%8D%E1%8B%B5-%E1%8B%88%E1%88%98%E1%8A%95%E1%8D%88%E1%88%B5-%E1%89%85%E1%8B%B1%E1%88%B5-%E1%8A%A0%E1%88%90%E1%8B%B1-%E1%8A%A0%E1%88%9D%E1%88%8B%E1%8A%AD-%E1%8A%A0%E1%88%9C%E1%8A%95--%E1%8B%A8%E1%8A%AB%E1%89%B2%E1%89%B5-29-%E1%89%80%E1%8A%95-03-10)
In these cases it's only possible to compare by using the first 2–3 stanzas (and/or counting the total number of stanzas) since it's exactly these stanzas (those at the start or end of hymns) that end up either being excerpted and used elsewhere or inserted from elsewhere (having been lone stanzas in origin). With this case, too, it can be tricky because the headword (እሰግድ፡) also may not be consistent in every copy. For example, I have noted ones that use "ሰላም፡ እብል፡ ለፅንሰትከ፡ ..." instead.
I'm sure I've seen the title "Malkǝʾa Madḫane ʿAlam - ʾƎsaggǝd" in at least one printed book (ie from Ethiopia) before. Here in EMML 6251 (below) it is considered to be "መልክአ፡ መድኃኔ፡ ዓለም፡ ካልእ፡", though such numbering can also vary from collector to collector.
In case it's helpful, my records count the number of stanzas for the malkəʾ as 33.
@smaugustine @eu-genia,
if I understand you correctly, you remarked, that the given 10 words are not enough to identify this piece as LIT2861RepCh142 or to create a new LIT ID from it. Do you agree to leave it unmarked e.g. without LIT ID in both cases?
I think that you could provisionally create the same ID to be also used in EMML 6251; if it ever comes out that the text is different it can be updated
@eu-genia @thea-m @DenisNosnitsin1970 @smaugustine
I found a Malkǝʾ in BLorient13273. It is entitled Malkǝʾa Madḫane ʿAlam - ʾƎsaggǝd by Strelcyn, who also gives an long incipit:
I wonder if this could be from LIT2861RepCh142, which is also mentioned with this title in the Bm record: https://betamasaheft.eu/works/LIT2861RepCh142/main. However, the incipit given by Chaîne in the Répertoire is very different, which leads me to believe that it is either from a different stanza of this text or from a different work altogether. Unfortunately, all four witnesses mentioned in this record and in Chaîne do not provide images for verification.
I found a strikingly similar text in EMIP00017:
I would suggest creating a new LIT ID for the work attested in these two manuscripts, unless we can identify it as part of something else.