Question about "Geoclient Issues" part II

BetaNYC / batch-geocoder-nyc

Batch geocoder for nyc. Fueled by Planning Lab's GeoSearch. Inspired by Erik Willems' Batch geocoder for journalists.

https://www.geocoder.nyc

GNU General Public License v3.0

7 stars 2 forks source link

Question about "Geoclient Issues" part II #4

Open mlipper opened 3 years ago

mlipper commented 3 years ago

Corrected text with

... NYC GeoSearch, which provides API to geocode quickly compared to GeoClient API. (GeoClient API is still an excellent tool for more advanced functions and has paved the way for accessible geocoding) ...

Originally posted by @zhik in https://github.com/BetaNYC/batch-geocoder-nyc/issues/3#issuecomment-754879321

mlipper commented 3 years ago

So now you're saying that NYC GeoSearch is faster than Geoclient? Let me be clear - I have no problem with you saying whatever you want about Geoclient and there's no need for you to praise Geoclient either.

However, if you make such claims, I'd ask you to be explicit about your justification or -- at the very least -- raise an issue on the Geoclient repo so I can either help solve them or explain the reasons for whatever issue you have encountered.

Thanks, Matt