Closed ClementCaporal closed 4 months ago
Should close #67
I propose to use concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor along with the already existing cfg.SYSTEM.NUM_WORKERS to speed up the process of detection.
concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor
cfg.SYSTEM.NUM_WORKERS
On my setup for 5.88 GB:
@danifranco Can you double check if the new documentation for cfg.SYSTEM.NUM_WORKERS is not too vague now?
Wow, super useful feature Clement, thanks a lot. SYSTEM.NUM_WORKERS as you changed I think it's good, so don't worry. I'm merging this code now!
SYSTEM.NUM_WORKERS
Should close #67
I propose to use
concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor
along with the already existingcfg.SYSTEM.NUM_WORKERS
to speed up the process of detection.On my setup for 5.88 GB:
@danifranco Can you double check if the new documentation for
cfg.SYSTEM.NUM_WORKERS
is not too vague now?