Note: Make sure you have read the FAQs
before logging this issue.
Feature Request / Question
-
Current Behaviour (Bug Report)
const bacnetClient = new Bacnet({
port: 47809, // Use BAC1 as communication port
interface: '192.168.222.11', // Listen on a specific interface
broadcastAddress: '192.168.222.255', // Use the subnet broadcast address
apduTimeout: 60000 // Wait twice as long for response
});
currently discovering in port 47808,but in options there is 47809.
So the bug in transport.js Line 100.
this._server.send(buffer, 0, offset, port || DEFAULT_BACNET_PORT , address);
Node Version:
v14.17.0
Node BACstack Version:
1.0.0
Note: Make sure you have read the FAQs before logging this issue.
Feature Request / Question
-
Current Behaviour (Bug Report)
const bacnetClient = new Bacnet({ port: 47809, // Use BAC1 as communication port interface: '192.168.222.11', // Listen on a specific interface broadcastAddress: '192.168.222.255', // Use the subnet broadcast address apduTimeout: 60000 // Wait twice as long for response });
currently discovering in port 47808,but in options there is 47809.
So the bug in transport.js Line 100. this._server.send(buffer, 0, offset, port || DEFAULT_BACNET_PORT , address);
variable "port" is undefined.
Expected Behaviour (Bug Report)
-
Steps to reproduce Issue (Bug Report)
-