Closed james-oldfield closed 6 years ago
A small fix--it seems tf.mul was replaced with tf.multiply in versions 1.0.0+ of TF
tf.mul
tf.multiply
Coverage decreased (-4.3%) to 89.262% when pulling 06d9faf4cbcec0124d535f2c4fb0c951bb1bb514 on James-Oldfield:develop into ba16a2acf482d4af48dd47ea04361b4b00ed4690 on Bihaqo:develop.
Sorry for losing track of things. The change looks great, do you have any idea why it could decrease the coverage so much?
A small fix--it seems
tf.mul
was replaced withtf.multiply
in versions 1.0.0+ of TF