Closed eliasyaoyc closed 2 years ago
sounds good, what can i do that help you reach stablity quickly ?
sounds good, what can i do that help you reach stablity quickly ?
If you have some experience in this area, I can work with you to accomplish this. :)
https://github.com/BinChengZhao/delay-timer/issues/4#issuecomment-767381469
trytry
trytry
// Here is an expected implementation for DelayTimer::add_task , which is not yet determined.
**Do you have a better opinion?**
///```
// let delay_timer = DelayTimer::default();
//
// let join_handle = delay_timer.add_task(_).unwrap();
//
// let peek : Option<Peek<&Instance>> = join_handle.peek().await;
// let peek : Result<Option<Peek<&Instance>>> join_handle.try_peek();
//
// let instance : Option<Intance> = join_handle.next().await.unwrap();
// let instance : Result<Option<Intance>> = join_handle.try_next().unwrap();
//
// instance.cancel();
//
///```
i spent some time on the delay_timer these days,now i hava general idea of it.
i think you gave me a good plan.
haha,holidy is coming soon do it
i spent some time on the delay_timer these days,now i hava general idea of it. i think you gave me a good plan.
Thank you, we can work together in one piece, so the energy will be great.
delicate Distributed scheduling platform, the first release has been stabilized, V1.1.0 will be released soon. :)
Yes, while this lib is basically stable (probably v0.3.5), I will start developing a distributed scheduling system.
Containing a web admin panel, with multiple nodes distributed across the machines.