BioContainers / specs

BioContainers specifications
http://biocontainers.pro
Apache License 2.0
49 stars 12 forks source link

Dual Base Image #70

Closed prvst closed 7 years ago

prvst commented 7 years ago

With the oficial release of Docker for Windows we now have to discuss the possibility / necessity of having a dual base image; one based on the latest Ubuntu LTS (like we already do), and the other based on Microsoft Windows. Do you guys, @BioContainers/contributors, think this is necessary ?

ypriverol commented 7 years ago

Is possible to run this into linux or not yet. If someone from the community has a Windows machine would be great to release a couple of contianers in Windows MaxQuant Skyline? @prvst

prvst commented 7 years ago

I have no idea how those windows images works, but I would not rush too much into proprietary and closed-software for those containers.

pcm32 commented 7 years ago

My understanding is that windows docker containers run only on top of windows machines, so you need a licenced windows installation.

On 18 Oct 2016 4:05 p.m., "Felipe Leprevost" notifications@github.com wrote:

I have no idea how those windows images works, but I would not rush too much into proprietary and closed-software for those containers.

— You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BioContainers/specs/issues/70#issuecomment-254536779, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWfXpnjW0l9F7RtS3TXOnFAyizafeOEks5q1OA9gaJpZM4KZ33H .

prvst commented 7 years ago

yes, thats also true

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:19 AM Pablo Moreno notifications@github.com wrote:

My understanding is that windows docker containers run only on top of windows machines, so you need a licenced windows installation.

On 18 Oct 2016 4:05 p.m., "Felipe Leprevost" notifications@github.com wrote:

I have no idea how those windows images works, but I would not rush too much into proprietary and closed-software for those containers.

— You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/BioContainers/specs/issues/70#issuecomment-254536779 , or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWfXpnjW0l9F7RtS3TXOnFAyizafeOEks5q1OA9gaJpZM4KZ33H

.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BioContainers/specs/issues/70#issuecomment-254541123, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYo-WaOpJtWmkgSEbank4dGOeNmlJX6ks5q1ON0gaJpZM4KZ33H .

ypriverol commented 7 years ago

That is not true docker already have the official channel of Microssoft with their based containers like the Ubuntu for Linux (official channel of Microsoft https://hub.docker.com/u/microsoft/). We can based our image on top of the windows image. The only problem is that you need a Windows machine to deploy, test and deploy those containers because they are not cross-platform. This is what I understand.

prvst commented 7 years ago

hum, yes, @ypriverol is right, but I think that's what @pcm32 was talking about it. And it must be a Windows 10 machine. Here at the University they only provide licenses for Windows 7.

pcm32 commented 7 years ago

Yes, that is what I meant, that you need a windows machine to run/deploy/test those containers.

bgruening commented 7 years ago

I don't think it is needed and we should push OpenSource as much as possible not the other way around :)

ypriverol commented 7 years ago

This issue can be closed. We will only support OpenSource.